Sunday, February 4, 2018

Proof a missile hit the Pentagon.

The Birth Certificate, Cesta Que Vie Trust. "Justice System"

The Birth Certificate, Cesta Que (Cestui Que Vie) Trust, "Justice System" and What Role We SHOULD Play

The following is a compilation of articles, videos and research related to the Cestui Que Vie trust, Birth Certificate. In my view, this is essential to understand how the legal system is fraudulent in its application of justice. But oddly enough, it is also a way to understand how a truly honorable system can work, if we only seek to understand and live the principles of truth and trust.

What may not be clear is that all these systems of control and enslavement are actually based on core principles of Natural Law, as expressed in Equity or Contract Law and Trust Law. Where the system fails is in execution, actually following the principles of trust on which legal codes are founded. In most cases dishonorable legislation such as the Patriot Act, would have never been  enacted if the people were fully aware of all the facts; full disclosure and transparency.

The system requires compliance and ignorance in order to suppress the rights of the people and maintain the illusion of justice. This is the only reason why most of humanity thinks the system works, despite being hopelessly inefficient, because they are decidedly ignorant of the whole truth. And by all accounts justice, as it is practiced today, has never been interested in following law or honoring trust. There are remedies on paper that individuals should be able to use, but even after one correctly asserts their rights, no remedy is rendered by the system; the law is ignored and courts breach trust as a matter of policy. This point cannot be overlooked.

Related U.S. Judges Are: Incompetent, Discriminatory and In Breach of Contract | A Documentary Script That Will Reveal The Fraud

Some in the freedom movement think that if we only say the right thing or file the correct paperwork, the system will be forced to comply with the law. But in truth, the system has never been designed for this, its designed to appear lawful; acting in the color of law. It is an illusion of justice. It is a for profit private enterprise that has usurped a once valid method of settling disputes, chiefly interested in deceiving and defrauding their patrons; the unwitting masses. At best it is a summary justice system, a type of 'fast-food' justice that offers the same deleterious effects on society as processed food has on health. 

There are countless scores of knowledgeable people that follow the rules and procedures within the system, hoping to gain remedy and reclaim their status as sovereign individuals, but in most cases the system ignores valid claims and honorable arguments. Therefore, the only logical conclusion to draw is that there is in fact NO JUSTICE, NO RULE OF LAW and NO REMEDY for the people. No amount of paper work, protests, certified letters or official documentation will cause the system to begin acting honorably, because it has to do so for everyone if it is to be a truly just system. 

A court, judge, or trustee that ignores the truth, by their very actions demonstrates the status of incompetency, negligence and lack of standing to hold the position they claim to represent. They are now in breach of trust and public contract, they have committed fraud and the only recourse a sovereign people have in the face of this is to embody honor and truth so as to replace the fallacious system. In the absence of legitimate government and true justice, the people's justice reigns supreme; so we better do our best to ensure its honest and fair.

Related How the Cabal Maintains Their Power And What You Need To Do To Stop It - Un-Consent | Beyond BRICS: Exposing the Rats

Related NO Law Requires You To Register or Pledge Your Private Automobile | Pulled over today with no license, license plate, or registration

Despite these sobering points, there is hope. The people have always had the power to settle their own affairs honorably and in truth. But, when two sovereign individuals are unable to settle a dispute, a third party can be appointed by them to assist in the matter; this is ostensibly the role of a Justice System. A beings ability to seek the truth and act compassionately and acknowledge others is what defines a sovereign being.
"Do no harm and cause no damage to property"
This common sense policy has been called the golden rule of law, and it is the foundation of every system of justice on Earth; including the defunct ones that now run rampant. But what if we encounter someone who is unwilling to act honorably? This is when a defensive action can be taken to ensure we are not harmed, but we must also ensure that this action does not cause harm in return. Eye for an eye justice is a fallacy of moral relativism and creates more controversy in the process, more harm that must be remedied.

One of the most important qualities of a sovereign is the capacity to gain, use and clarify knowledge; the choice to seek the truth. In doing so they recognize the fundamental interconnectedness of all things, and that ultimately love, compassion and empathy are essential to settling disputes with other sovereign beings.

The following is essential material for the aspiring sovereign, one who knows where they are going, how they will get there and who will be affected in the process. For with great freedom comes great responsibility, requiring a wise and truth knowing mind so as to live harmoniously with others.


The CESTUI QUE VIE Trust is an account you inherited due to the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933 and the subsequent ceasing of all the citizens' gold, silver and other assets as collateral. This account contains millions of dollars in your name. The only problem is that the government and legal system failed to inform you about it and how to access your money. In the meantime, they are drawing down on it for their own personal use and as payment to the Vatican and the English crown.

Related Pope 'Ruler of the World' to go after War Criminals?

"It is the funds contained in this CESTUI QUE VIE that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments."

"Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a portion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations."

"You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company, Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these CESTUI QUE VIE Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature."

[Here is a video discussing the trust relationships in a court room and some techniques for possibly gaining freedom from summary justice process. This involves asserting your standing as executor to the trust, using a Writ process. This is for research and informational purposes only. I do not advise using any process unless you have complete intrinsic knowledge of all factors involved. Even then, do so understanding in all likelihood the system will not act honorably.]

[Here is a section about the CESTUI QUE VIE (CQV) Trust and one method of declaring status as a living executor; the highest position of authority in the trust relationship. While this method is founded in law, in most cases the judge would rather abandon the court than loose their standing.]


Claim the 'Cestui Que Vie' BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account:
(This is hugely sensitive material, pay attention people!) 

(Title 31 U.S.Code 1321/1322), - Nationality Act, 1940
& watch the Judge seemingly freak out when you bring this sensitive information to the table. Inform the Judge that you are the EXECUTOR of the trial, and the judge is the ADMINISTRATOR of the trial & publicly define the roles of the CQV trust.

The judge is unlawfully attempting to access your TRUST & can do so only through your consent, by deceiving you into agreeing to let them assume improper roles which grant them authority.
(This is the unfortunate, corrupt reality that our peaceful, law abiding communities are dealing with in the court system today)


- Judge = TRUSTEE of the CQV trust
- Clerk = ADMINISTRATOR of the CQV trust

(Both Judge & Clerk must follow YOUR instructions for discharge / dismissal as YOU are the Executor of the trial and Beneficiary of the CQV trust.)

[When they fail to do so, they dishonor their role and breach the trust; the highest crime in trust law. This is grounds for immediate termination of responsibilities, but in many cases, the judge will still retain possession via use of violence; the police, bailiff, sheriff etc.]

The pseudo judges of these pseudo courts have NO powers without the consent of both the plaintiff and the defendant. (AND) In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.

Note: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted onto Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk, and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays for all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those investments.

[This is discussed in more detail by Judge Dale in his book.]
Declaring Status Properly:

"I am here by Special Appearance, Sui Juris Autonomous en Personam, as the Belligerant Claimant in person.
"In addition, for the record,
* "I am the Authorized Administrator and Executor of the CESTA QUE TRUST created under the all caps name “ROBERT Q EVANS”. You are the Trustee, State / Mr. Prosecutor & I do not consent to being surety for these proceedings. In addition, I demand the bond be immediately brought forward so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.
At your Arraignment or Trial, the Judge will ask you if you are the named individual [ALL CAPS BIRTH NAME] on the complaint and your natural response will be to answer in the affirmative but that is exactly what you don’t want to do!
Remove your birth certificate and respond by stating: "I am making Special Limited Appearance on behalf of the defendant who is right here" [Hold up your Birth Certificate!]

Then State the following:

"As I understand the process Judge; the county attorney or Police Officer has leveled a criminal charge with the Clerk against the TRUST, using the ALL CAPS NAME that appears on this BIRTH CERTIFICATE! The use of capital letters is dictated by the US Printing Style manual, which explains how to identify a CORPORATION.

"The Clerk, who is the ADMINISTRATOR of the CESTA QUE TRUST , then, appointed you Judge as the TRUSTEE for the TRUST and since neither of you can be the BENEFICIARY, that leaves me and therefore you are MY TRUSTEE!

"So as MY TRUSTEE, I instruct you to discharge this entire matter with prejudice and award the penalties for these crimes to be paid to me in compensation and damages for my false arrest!

Note: The Law Of Trusts dictates that an Administrator; Trustee and Beneficiary cannot serve two positions in a Trust. So a Trustee cannot be a Beneficiary too.

***The TRUSTEE Judge has no alternative but to honor your demands but you have to get this right and act with confidence. You really need to know this information well, so that you can’t be hoodwinked or confused by either of them! They will or may attempt to play some mind games with you if you display any doubt; stammer or display a lack of confidence. Appearances of the Pseudo courts is totally for your benefit and is intended to invoke fear and intimidation. If you show fear or intimidation, you get a pony ride.

The Supreme Court has warned, "Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance." (U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187),

"the powers that be" that you are alive and claim the Cestui Que BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST account, (Title 31 U.S. Code 1321/1322), is what we are supposed to do too. - Nationality Act, 1940.

#2) How to avoid prosecution under the Trust, when a Sovereign is taken before a corporate prosecuting Attorney or a Judge:

First: the Sovereign must inquire if we are on the record, and if not, insist upon it!
Say nothing, sign nothing and answer no questions until you are convinced that the proceedings are being recorded!

Secondly: all a Sovereign has to say for the record is: “I am a beneficiary of the Trust, and I am appointing you as my Trustee!”

Thirdly: the Sovereign then directs his Trustee to do his bidding! “As my Trustee, I instruct you to discharge this matter I am accused of and eliminate the record!”

Fourthly: if the Sovereign suffered any damages as a result of his arrest, he can direct that the Trust compensate him from the proceeds of the Court by saying; “I wish to be compensated for [X] dollars, in redemption.” This statement is sufficient to remove the authority and jurisdiction from any prosecuting attorney or judge. The accused will be immediately released from custody, with a check, license or claim he identifies as a damage. It doesn’t matter what the action involves or how it is classified by the corporate law as a civil or criminal action!

[Again, if the system was designed to honor trust law, the aforementioned techniques would work every time. But they don't because the people in these roles dishonor the trust. Despite this, the principles of trust are sound and in understanding them we can learn how to act as true sovereigns; actually being trustworthy. While the system is dishonorable, it requires honorable actions to correct as we by our very deeds become the better way.]

Anna von Reitz

I have been asked to summarize this issue many times, so here it is in the proverbial nutshell.

The problem is that privately owned for-profit corporations under contract to provide government services have misrepresented themselves as the government and used that presumed position of public trust to defraud us, enslave us, and levy false claims against us and our assets in the foreign jurisdiction of international commerce.

The misuse and abuse of “birth certificates” and their misrepresentation as “voluntary private contracts” has led to the literal enslavement of hundreds of millions of people worldwide almost a hundred years after slavery was universally outlawed. These issues of economic slavery and “slavery via corporate proxy” must be addressed and the mechanisms used to promote this abuse must be dismantled.

The registration of live births in America and throughout the former British Empire, most of Europe, and Japan is used not to simply record the birth of babies, but to name commercial “vessels” after those babies. These proxy entities may be variously constructed as estate trusts, foreign situs trusts, or even public transmitting utilities—- the creators of these incorporated entities named after living children then operate these corporations and accrue debts that they false charge against the living people using the deceitfully similar name as a means to defraud the victims. This is a bunko crime known as “personage”—knowingly “mistaking on purpose” a living man for a corporation using the same or similar name— for example, mistaking a man named “James Clarence Penny” for the retail department store doing business as “JC PENNY”.

The corollary crime routinely practiced by attorneys and barristers is known as “barratry”—knowingly bringing charges against this corporate proxies “as if” they were the same as the living people they are named after, and addressing those same people as defendents in civil and criminal actions. This is the tip of the iceberg of the harm that is routinely done to living people via the misuse of incorporated proxy entities merely named after them. It is a venal institutionalized fraud scheme that must be recognized for what it is and attacked by every peaceful and determined means possible.

When my son was born I was presented with the paperwork that all new Mothers are coerced to sign. When I refused I was bluntly told by two menacing interns and a Catholic Nun that I either signed or my son would be kept in State custody and I would not be allowed to take him home. Please bear in mind that I was a successful 40 year old married career woman with no criminal record, no addiction problems, no history of mental illness. There was and is no possible excuse for the way I and millions of other American women are treated and the extortion used to secure an inequitable, involuntary, and unconscionable “public” commercial interest in our babies as a chattel properties being bonded and used as collateral to finance the “public debt” of these private governmental services corporations pretending to be the American government.

Those responsible were and are criminals engaged in press-ganging land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea, inland piracy, enslavement, human trafficking, unlawful conversion, extortion, racketeering, armed robbery, kidnapping, commercial fraud, and conspiracy against The Constitution for the United States of America. Every single person involved in this needs to be charged and arrested and thrown in jail without further delay, but the police are employed by the same privately owned and operated corporations that are benefitting themselves from these gross abuses.

That is, the police forces that we depend upon to enforce the Public Law are operating instead as private commercial mercenaries, not as public peacekeeping officers at all. The foxes are indeed guarding the hen houses of America, a circumstance that again requires awareness and action by the body politic to resolve.

As I have explained, the organizations we are dealing with are governmental services corporations—- not our lawful government. They are merely claiming to “represent” our government in the absence of our actual government, which is owed to us, and which must be provided by us. This addresses the heart of what “self-government” means.

Every living American has more civil authority on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States than the entire Federal United States government. It’s time that we exercised that inherent power and put an end to this gross criminality, fraud, and usurpation by our “public servants”.

The historical facts and timeline progression of how we got into this mess is fully explained in “You Know Something Is Wrong When….. An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”, available on Amazon. com.

Birth Certificate Explained

Since the early 1960's, State governments — themselves specially created, juristic, corporate persons signified by all caps — have issued Birth Certificates to "persons" with legal fiction all-caps names. This is not a lawful record of your physical birth, but rather the birth of the juristic, all-caps name. It may appear to be your true name, but since no proper name is ever written in all caps (either lawfully or grammatically) it does not identify who you are. The Birth Certificate is the government’s self-created document of title for its new “property,” i.e. the deed to the juristic-name artificial person whose all-caps name “mirrors” your true name. The Birth Certificate brings the new all-caps name into colorable admiralty/maritime law, the same way a ship (and ship of state) is berthed.
When a child is born, the hospital sends the original, not a copy, of the record of live birth to the "State Bureau of Vital Statistics," sometimes called the "Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services" (HRS). Each STATE is required to supply the UNITED STATES with birth, death, and health statistics. The STATE agency that receives the original record of live birth keeps it and then issues a Birth Certificate in the corrupted, all-caps version of the baby’s true name, i.e. JAMES WILBER SMITH.

cer-tif-i-cate, noun. Middle English certificat, from Middle French, from Medieval Latinceruficatum. from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3: a document evidencing ownership or debt.-- Merriam Webster Dictionary (1998).

The Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce -- the Executive Office -- specifically through their own sub-agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, which is responsible to register vital statistics from all the States. The word "registered," as it is used within commercial or legal based equity law, does not mean that the all-caps name was merely noted in a book for reference purposes. When a Birth Certificate is registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, it means that the all-caps legal person named thereon has become a surety or guarantor, a condition and obligation that is automatically and unwittingly assumed unless you rebut the presumption by effectively noticing them: “It ain’t me.”

Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the original contract. -- Duhaime's Law Dictionary.

1: a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking.

2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another.

Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor, and the two terms are generally interchangeable.

Merriam Webster's "Dictionary of Law" (1996).
Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately, as part of an independently contract with the obligee of the original contract.

Duhaime's Law Dictionary.

It is not difficult to see that a state-created Birth Certificate, with an all-caps, name is a document evidencing debt the moment it is issued. Once a state has registered a birth document with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the Department notifies the Treasury Department, which takes out a loan from the Federal Reserve. The Treasury uses the loan to purchase a bond (the Fed holds a “purchase money security interest” in the bond) from the Department of Commerce, which invests the sale proceeds in the stock or bond market.

The Treasury Department then issues Treasury securities in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the bonds as surety for the new “securities.” This cycle is based on the future tax revenues of the legal person whose name appears on the Birth Certificate. This also means that the bankrupt, corporate U.S. can guarantee to the purchasers of their securities the lifetime labor and tax revenues of every “citizen of the United States”/American with a Birth Certificate as collateral for payment. This device is initiated simply by converting the lawful, true name of the child into a legal, juristic name of a person.

Dubuque rei potissinia pars prineipium est — The principal part of everything is in the beginning. (“Well begun is half done.”)

Legally, you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various Federal, State and local governments via your STATE-issued and STATE-created Birth Certificate in the name of your all-caps person. Birth Certificates are issued so that the issuer can claim “exclusive” title to the legal person created thereby. This is further compounded when one voluntarily obtains a Driver’s License or a Social Security Account Number. The state even owns your personal and private life through your STATE-issued marriage license/certificate issued in the all-caps names. You have no rights in birth, marriage, or even death. The state holds title to all legal persons the state creates via Birth Certificates until the rightful owner, i.e. you, reclaims/redeems it by becoming the holder in due course of the instrument."

And this pic shows a REGISTRATION of a Record of Birth, which would tend to support the claims about the BC in the above article. Why the heck would a record of birth need to be REGISTERED? And with a Department of Commerce? Record alone is all that's needed to prove that the birth happened, as long as it's certified (stamped and signed by a proper officer of a State)


Saturday, February 3, 2018

About 'Ex Rel' and Nom Deguerre

About 'Ex Rel' and Nom Deguerre

'Ex Rel' is the lawful position one takes with a fictitious 'name' or a Nom Deguerre.  A Nom Deguerre is a fictitious name, a war name, a name assumed for a time.
Ex Rel' is used in regards to a Birth Certificated 'name'.  A Birth Certificate is an instrument that indicates a Title exist somewhere (as all certificates indicate) However, that title is not the El or the Bey.  The Birth Certificate is the instrument that proves Human Trafficking, therefore there is nothing to redeem.  The proper use of 'not throwing it away" is to Ex Rel it, which means you information about it - the 'birth certificated name', but it is not you and  NEVER was. It has nothing to do with the flesh and blood being.  Therefore the use of 'Ex Rel" is the lawful position that Noble Drew Ali meant for you in regards to not getting rid of it, AND to do all NEW business in your new name.'  Of course upon study, he trusted you would find that out, as the half had not been told.  Don't believe us, try it, instead of trying to redeem it and running from it.
Ex Rel is in relationship to having INFORMATION ONLY regarding the nom deguerre or straw, as many have called it, or regarding any fiction, as fictions CANNOT speak for themselves.  That is why an Attorney is always forced upon you, as Attorney's are for the purpose of speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves, i.e., corporations.  What many call the 'Straw Name' and others call a 'transmitting utility' is really lawfully a 'Nom Deguerre'.  A Nom Deguerre is a fictitious name, a war name, a name assumed for a time.  Therefore what you call a birth certificated name, or in error, a government name, or straw, or transmitting utility, or slave name, fits any part or all of the definition of a 'nom deguerre'.  It is possibly easier, at first to see it as a name assumed for a time, and you have decided that 'time' is up, until you can fully understand how it is a war name and how it is fictitious.  That is secondarily easier because you know it was established by a corporation and is in all caps, which by all defintions is a fiction because anything in all caps indicates a corporation name.  A 'name' is a label and is meant for corporations.  You would have an appellation, which means to call out to, and an attribute.  However, an attribute is not a proper appellation.  It would be likened to a nick-name, but is not that either, as it is a descriptive persona or personality quality.  The Nom Deguerre (often referred to as Straw or Transmitting Utility), was created by a certificate and any other instruments created from it, i.e. drivers license, marriage license, etc., are void because it comes from a void instrument in the first instance.  THEREFORE you do not need to go through any process to make it Void or Voidable.  
Name comes under the 14th Amendment as a fiction, a corporate citizen or member jurisdiction.  The 14th Amendment, although NOT ratified, was established under the jurisdiction of a corporate state, for and referring to corporations from its inception and never meant for natural beings, therefore any 'person' answering to it, is potentially corporate state chattel property with NO RIGHTS to be acknowledged.  Those instruments are in themselves proof of human slavery or human trafficking.  It does NOT put you on the stock market, as you are not on the stock market, that piece of paper, certificate - bond is, but not you.  You are to Ex Rel it whenever it comes up.  There are only two people who can make an 'Ex Rel" claim and that is either the Attorney General (speaking for a fiction, i.e. any corporate state)  or by one who is in their proper person status - that would be YOU!  Naturally you have more information regarding the straw then anyone.  Please read the Article we have on this site in regards to Ex Rel.  It is found on the Jurisprudence page, along with articles in regards to "Rescission of Signature" and "Use of U.C.C.'s.  DO NOT get caught up in thinking you have to go through a host of hoops in order to be who you are and to navigate socially.  Making the claim and Proclamation eliminates most all colorable documents, which are "void of law" from their inception or "void ab initio" therefore if they are 'void ab initio" there is no need for you to void them!!!  You simply need to have knowledge regarding them.  Click here to go to the Jurisprudence page for the articles "About Ex Rel", "Rescission of Signature" and "Use of U.C.C.'s.  

Name:  The designation of an individual  person, or of a firm or corporation.

A person's 'name' consists of one or more Christian or given names and one surname or family name.  It is the distinctive characterization in words by which one is known and distinguished from others, and description, or abbreviation is NOT the equivalent of a 'name'.  

Custom gives one his father's family name, and such praenomen as his parents choose to put before it, but this is only a general rule, from which  an individual may depart, if he chooses.

As to the history of Christian names and surnames and their use and relative importance in law, see In Re Snook, 2 Hilt, N.Y., 566.

NOTE:  There is no mention of a title in the definition of 'name', as it is not only  a corporate tag, it is also a Christian corporate tag. Therefore, it honors the Father's 'name' and not the Mother. If they are burying the Mother, that is where the heritage and history gets lost, but not all forgotten, in that the condition of the Child is based on and determined by, the condition of the Mother in National and International Law and Maxims to this day. The mis-directing is tied to the practice of Marriage instead of Matrimony.
 We can fix this if we would just get to thinking! The Following Is a Public Announcement:


The Police Officer swears and or Oaths upon the American Constitution as an Officer of Law. Supreme Court Decisions are recognition of Res Judicata, which exist already as Secured Rights that cannot be liened upon, therefore are inalienable / unalienable.

SUPREME COURT CASE: Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for refusing to present identification. There is no such thing as “FAILURE TO IDENTIFY”. You can Sue the Police for an illegal Arrest. Showing identification is a courtesy and they (police officers) CANNOT determine if your ID is valid or not, as they usually predicate the validity of an identification on whether or not it was issued by the corporation they work for. However corporations CANNOT issue lawful identification to a flesh and blood natural being.

Therefore Declaring your status is to be clear about these matters. 'The courts are not bound by an officers interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act. Hoffsomer v. Hayes, 92 Okla 32, 227 F. 417 4 The following information is necessary to address the alike amongst us – Moors conscious or unconscious, who know not what they do! Important Information Regarding Moors Universal Allodial National Identification Card Please note that what substantiates an identification card is the inclusion of one’s Nationality. Thus a nationality card and a proper identification card are ONE IN THE SAME!!!. Any other card could be a membership card, library card, drivers license, (which is a membership card), club association card, etc., of which none of them necessarily require a nationality on it. We must know the difference between a nationality card, membership card, identification card and any combination of same. Any corporate state’s identification does not include a nationality because they are quasi-national domiciles, thus do not have the jurisdiction (right to speak or issue) anything to natural flesh and blood beings or national matters.

 For example: the discussion of making the ‘drivers license instrument’ an identification card is a mute one because it itself is a membership card indicating you are an associate or member of the private Division of Motor Vehicles. The Division of Motor Vehicles is a corporate entity constructed under the corporate State’s jurisdiction and they are forbidden to abrogate / violate ANY of the people’s liberties. “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 A right which is free and open to all is not the subject of a license or tax. Chicago v Collins, 51 NE 907; Freeburg v Dawson 274 F 240.

The Division of Motor Vehicles is NOT a government entity and the license instrument is not necessary for one to travel upon the highways and by-ways. If the DMV were a government entity, still the license instrument is not necessary for one to travel upon the highways. The DMV is a private corporation, an enclave of it’s respective state and corporations have no parity with the real, with the flesh and blood natural being, other then to follow the Law of the Land, which is established to protect, preserve and secure the liberties and rights of the natural being. Any corporation can ONLY issue to members / citizens of it. Therefore the driver instrument is NOT an identification card. DO NOT be FOOLED by the recent and new U.S. National citizenship choice, as that is also established for those UNDER the jurisdiction of the corporate state and is a trick to get people who are beginning to think along the lines of national principles, to come under it, just because it has the word national in it. Anything a corporation issues is for the corporation’s employees / servants, members / citizens and that is not you. The drivers instrument is for commerce and commercial use in regards to one who is ‘driving’ or a ‘driver’, as distinguished from a Traveler, of which natural people have the absolute and substantive Right and Liberty to Travel as it is their Personal liberty without the corporate state’s drivers license, tags, registration, insurance, etc.

ALSO PLEASE NOTE that a Nationality Card DOES NOT bring you your Nationality!! Nationality is bestowed upon you from birth from your mother. Any thing in written form is a brief expressing your position regarding a matter and that would include the card itself, as a brief, a claim. 5 As for the Temples established by Prophet Noble Drew Ali:

Friday, February 2, 2018


The following are additional case laws to keep in mind.
 “A state cannot impose restrictions on the acceptance of a license that will deprive the licensee of his constitutional rights”.  Ruckenbrod v. Mullins, 102 Utah 548, 133 P.2d. 325, 144 ALR 839
There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of the exercise of a constitutional  right.

Sherar v. Cullen,  481 F. 945 (9th Cir. 1973)  Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967)  GARRITY v. NEW JERSEY, 385 U.S. 493 (1967)  BOYD v. U S, 116 U.S. 616 (1886)  MALLOY v. HOGAN, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)   
“No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105.
“A writing is ‘void ab initio’ in the case of fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of avoidance”. Bonacci v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., (1943) 58 CA 2d 657,664.  
When a citizen is attempting to enforce the Constitution, as herein shown, he is doing so "not for himself alone but also [for others] as a 'private attorney general' vindicating a policy that [the Constitution writers] considered of the highest priority." Newman v Piggie Park Enterprises, 390 US 400; 88 S Ct 964, 966; 19 L Ed 2d 1263, 1265 (1969); Oatis v Crown Zellerbach Corp, 398 F2d 496, 499 (CA 5, 1968); and Jenkins v United Gas Corp, 400 F2d 28, 33 n 10 (CA 5, 1968).

"An administrative regulation, of course, is not a "statute." U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431  
Statutes must be known:
"Vagueness of wording is aggravated by prolixity and profusion of statutes, regulations, and administrative machinery, and by manifold cross-references to interrelated enactments and rules,Keyishian v Board of Regents of U. of St. of N. Y., 385 US 603, 604; 87 S Ct 675, 684; 17 L Ed 2d 629 (1967).
 .Drivers License Fraud

By Taj Tarik Bey
The 'Highest Court' in the Land (possessing Original Jurisdiction) has ruled that "No State can make any laws or rules that abrogate the Peoples’ Rights or the Supreme Law of the Land".  However, due to extreme levels of debauchery, misprision and fraud permeating all levels of government, by dishonest politicians,  judges, and prosecutors, the Natural People have been consistently robbed and suffer the destructive results of abuse of authority.  Criminals wearing black robes, and faking as Article III judges, have created and acted as auctioneers, administering a system of deception that has led many unsuspecting Natural People into “believing” that they (the accused) have violated the Law, when in fact they have not.  The theives and criminal officers of municipals courts all over the land, have converted Rights, secured and reserved for the People, into crimes. Thereafter, fining and jailing them, under a 'Color of Law' and a 'Color of Authority'.  Color means, "A an appearance, a semblence, or simulacrum, as distingquished from that which is real".  Color, Fake, Immitation, Misrepresentation, and Fraud are synonyms.  
     Concerning the social position of the Natural People, in their relationships with others:  “Due care” is an important issue, and involves having and maintaining a keen sense of responsibility to recognize the rights of others. This is the social duty of all citizens and Natural People, when interacting publicly and with others.  A lack of preserving civil responsibilities, or a blatant neglect of civilized principles (morals and ethics) would be detrimental to all.  A fundamental knowledge of the 'de jure' Law of the Land, (Constitution / Treaties) which preserves and secures the Rights of all Natural Beings and citizens, is a common social obligation, relegated to all members of a society.  Ignorance, greed, colonialism, and the construction of fraudulent adhesion contracting (legal frauds) have caused many to divulge themselves as being far less than honorable, and reveals their true deceptive tendencies and will to violate the basic moral and ethical principles of civilization.  Unkind actions and anti-constitutional legislation, created by the 'unclean hands' of ill-trusted corporate administrators, have proven highly destructive to the 'Unalienable Rights' of the Natural People.  Unalienable Rights are Rights which are not 'Alienable. This means that such Rights cannot be transferred or sold to another, etc.
    Political thieves (usually descendants of European Colonists operating upon the American Continents) have, by outright criminality, taken unlawful leave and advantages of the usurped seats of government, and have polluted the sanctity of their Official Oaths to uphold the Constitution and Treaties and are unlawfully violating the Natural People.  Consequently, much of the ignorance (plaguing and stagnating the Natural People) has more to do with deliberate misguidance, misprision, falsehoods, and miseducation. This is due to a designed lack of knowledge, deviously promoted and controlled by these same miscreants.  Pseudo-government operatives, (administrative) have knowingly, and with forethought, often substituted themselves for true (Article III judicial) sanctioned authorities. Organized criminal controlers of these misrepresented seats or offices of authority, have made and generated incalculable amounts of finance for unchecked municipal racketeers. 
     Racketeering is a law term that applies to an organized conspiracy to commit the crimes of extortion or coercion, or attempts to commit extortion or coercion. Racketeering is the obtaining of money or property from another, without his consent, induced by the wrongful use of force or fear. The fear which constitutes the legally nescessary element in extortion is induced by oral or written threats to do an unlawful injury to the property of the treatened person by means of explosives, fire, or otherwise; or to kill, kidnap, or injure him or her, or a relative of his or her family, etc. 
     "Purgery - of - Oath" perpetrators - being the unsanctioned administrators ministers of cities, towns, boroughs - inclusive of their contracted Municipal Court officers, have usurped judicial powers (for their own private benefit). Many have suffered beuroghcratic forced - servitude by their unlawful acts; as they have used jurisdictional powers (not delegated to them) to incarcerate people, and to colorably put people at risk; placing them into perpetual patterns of legal (yet not lawful) compromission; and bringing about losses of property, losses of finances, and constant abrogation of their Unalienable Rights and Substantive Rights.  Poverty and theft by design, incorporating jail, as an industry, has been used to State agents and agencies to impose coercive extorcion - initiated by "lack - of - due - process Pleas" made before unlawful private corporate tribunals.  Most of these being misrepresented as legitimate courts.  This politically—protected criminality has hindered many Natural People from enjoying or exercising Rights secured by the Constitution / Treaty and the Bill of Rights.  Criminals in government have thus, imposed feudal fees upon the people, converting rights into crimes, and hindering them from traveling, etc. 

     When the Natural People (Heirs Apparent) have, possess, or gain a clear understanding and knowledge of how they have been robbed and exploited by these foreign, unworthy adulterers of the Law, they can, and will, begin such necessary (anti-racketeering) actions and studies as needed to remedy their injuries and begin to turn around the conspiratorial extortions and foul acts of arbitrary commited on a daily basis.  It must be clearly understood by all that the States' "drivers license instruments" are a 'Corporate Use Tax” relegated to foreign corporate privileges, and are 'Customs Payments' made to the alleged 'Sovereign', and deemed for commercial usage and privilege.  When Natural Persons are operating their own private vehicles, conveyances, automobiles, or vessels, unless they are corporately carrying passengers for hire, they are not “driving”; they are “traveling”. Driving pertains to commercial activities. Traveling the public roadways and highways are natural and Substantive Rights; having nothing to do with privleges.  This clear distinction between the words, driving and traveling may seem to be trivial to some readers, however, that specificity has caused many to lose a substantial amount of freedoms and finance.  For many poor families, this disingenuousness has manifested into politically instigated and targeted economic states of “Depression”.
Below is an example and explanation about the misuse of administrative and ministerial powers.  These facts and concepts may help one to understand how to get out from under the foul yoke of being robbed by agencies and persons who have been, and are, using extortion tactics, guised under the misrepresented Surcharges. 
Due To Failure To Pay Surcharge

If you (the Natural Person)are operating with the States' imposed driving instrument, and had a "Surcharge” imposed upon you, know that the contract - instrument is essentially a surcharge for “being stopped” from exercising a right.  It is important for one to know that such an imposed ‘Surcharge’ is an unlawful and unauthorized ‘Impost’.  Imposts are taxes, levies, or duties imposed upon foreign nations or corporations.  Surcharges are compound or secondary fees or fines, levied against one for ‘Driving’ and are typically spread over monthly extortion - payments for a few years or so.  The ministerially - adjudicated ‘Surcharges’ are usually paid (under threat of warrant or arrest) to a different entity, person, and address other than the State-contracted Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).  Such acts are actually active and constructive fraud, and are no more than collusive acts of (Conspiracy).  If the Natural Person or citizen fails to pay the ‘Surcharges’ (ransoms) in the time or manner they (employees of the Agencies / Municipalities) have set, or imposed, they then notify the DMV to suspend the States’ imposed license, which is rented annually for a fee. Such an action instituted against anyone, must be relegated to (conspiracy to extort). 
     The Corporate Municipal Agents also notify the local courts, police officers, townships, cities, court systems, etc., to take unwarranted legal—process actions against you (the accused violator).  The usurping State, (through its hired thieves) thusly uses “color-of Law” and “Color of Authority” to hinder you (the Natural People and Citizens) from traveling the public roadways and highways. This deduces the use of the driver’s license to an instrument used to effectuate and veil organized theft and extortion. The thieves then conspire to systematically serve you (the alleged violator) with new Tickets / Suits / Bills of Exchange / Summons, to appear or pay, or both. The colluders often threaten to, again, suspend the States’ License and may also impose possible jail time.  All of these administrative acts are unlawful.  As an example:.
What is a Surcharge? A ‘Surcharge’ is a bill that has been filed to open a claim, an exaction, an impost, or an encumbrance, beyond that which is just and right; or beyond one’s authority or power.
     If a ’Surcharge’ is beyond what is just or right, and is done without authority, doesn’t such an act constitute racketeering and other criminal actions of fraud?  One must always question Jurisdiction and consider (by way of Constitutional principles) who created these ’Surcharge’ Bills, and who opened these files?  Furthermore,  where was or is your copy of the Bill?  According to the rule of Discovery, you are lawfully supposed to also have been presented with an original copy of the same! If a copy of the document / instrument (Bill) cannot be produced by the prosecutor / accusers / claimants, with  your signature, then such a Bill is a fraud, unlawful, and un-actionable.  Thus, such acts are a “Nullity”.  A ’Nullity or Nully’ is a term in law, which essentially regards and refers to an unlawful administrative court officer’s decision or action as being ’Nothing in Law” or “Void of Law.  Nullies are often attached to unconstitutional decisions made by officials acting under ’colorable’ processes.  As an aside, and addition to these facts, such agencies cannot make ‘Judicial Decisions’ - they do not possess the authority. Such powerful Article III jurisdictional authority is not in their capacity, and such unsanctioned courts and Judges cannot violate the laws of the Constitution, by which they are bound to support and uphold by Official Oaths. (See Article VI of the Constitution and Oath of Ethics).  Administrative Judges or Ministerial Officers (traffic court judges) do not have, or possess, the authoritative or lawful power at all to make judicial decisions.  They are ministerial in status and character.  Thus, they are incompetent, and are knowingly violating the established Law of the Land!
  • "Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities."  Burns v. Sup., Ct., SF140 Cal. 1.
  • "A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principle of administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, arguments, and rationale for that of the agency.  Additionally, courts are prohibited from substituting their judgment for that of the agency. Courts in administrative issues are prohibited from even listening to or hearing arguments, presentation, or rational." ASIS v. US,568 F2d 284.
    ·         The State is prohibited from violating substantive rights. Owens v. City, 445 US 662 (1980); and it can not do by one power (eg. Police power) that which   is, for example, prohibited expressly to any other such power (eg. Taxation / Eminent Domain) as a matter of law. US and UT v. Daniels, 22 p 159, nor indirectly that which is prohibited to it directly. Fairbanks v. US 181, US 283, 294, 300:
·         Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation, which would abrogate them. Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436, 125:
·         State courts, like federal courts, have a “constitutional obligation” to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law. Stone v. Powell 428 US 465, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067.
·         The obligation of state courts to give full effect to federal law is the same as that of federal courts. New York v. Eno. 155 US 89, 15 S. Ct. 30, 39 L. Ed. 80.
·         An administrative agency may not finally decide the limits of its statutory powers; this is a judicial function. Social Security Board v. Nierotko. 327 US 358, 66 S. Ct. 637, 162 ALR 1445, 90 L. Ed. 719.
Lex semper dabit remedium”  = “The Law will always give a remedy.”
     The reader is, at this juncture of this treatise, presented with the responsibility to use 'reason' and to make clear distinctions between that foul, colorable body of fraud—based legislation and policies (which are not law), and that of the 'rightful' Supreme Law of the Land (Constitution and Treaties).
     Another example of fraud is that the perpetrators of the Surcharge Division may say that you owe them finance.  Do you have a contract with them? Did they loan you anything? There exists no lawful, willful instrument, bearing your signature to such a contract — law—violating agreement.  If you (the accused) ever ask the agent(s) / representative(s) / accuser(s) to provide such required contractual or documented evidence, they will not; they do not, and they cannot. They are criminals, and are loath to produce self-incriminating evidence against their own self-serving corruption and proof of their ‘Perjury of Oaths’.  If the case or action, initiated by them, is based upon those instruments, then they must (by due—process of law) provide it or them.  Otherwise, there is no lawful claim or case before the Court.  Even if you (the accused) did allegedly owe them, or anyone else, finance, their acts of notifying other private-law systems, or making contracts with other agencies, (and signing on your behalf) to collect such alleged debts, is tantamount to extortion and identity theft.  When they, through their agency, contractors,  or agencies, notifies local, regional, and state, court systems and court officers, (speaking for them) to take an ‘Action’ against you for failure to pay them, then they are committing conspiratorial extortion.  All parties involved are then acting as a collection agency.  This includes the police officer(s) or policy enforcer(s), who stopped you in the first place or instance.  The initiating agent (policeman) is acting in the capacity of a collection agent for the private corporate businesses (insurance companies, et al). Thus, the policemen is an active partner or part of the Conspiracy.  According to the Codes of Law for the United States of North America, all officers and officials are responsible for any acts committed under ‘Color’ whether he or she knows it or not; and whether he or she is doing what he or she is told by superiors or others, to do or to initiate an unwarranted or colorable act!  
An example of Conspiracy, corruption, and “Perjury of Oath” becomes obvious when one reads the following Law Enforcement "Code Of Ethics", which all Law Officers must take. 
 After reading the Oath Of Ethics, let us examine another area of Fraud:  The State Motor Vehicle Agency (DMV), repeatedly and unlawfully acts in the above-stated capacity as well.  Their officers, contractors, and employees often, and regularly, receive ‘Notices’ from the other ‘Surcharge Divisions’ to adjudicate actions geared to suspend the state’s license instrument for failure to pay them their prescribed amount of (extortion) payments, whereas they have (by color) converted the Constitutional and Treaty—secured Rights of the Natural People into crimes, in order to raise revenues.  The DMV then arbitrarily suspends your rights-converting license (which is conspiratorial extortion).  This promotes  threats of arrest, incarceration, and the like.  This is especially evident because the DMV also charges you a ransom fee to re-instate the fraud-based license, which they, themselves, have imposed upon the Natural People.  The Constitution Principles and Obligations, which bind all judges, legislators, representatives, and other judicial officers of the courts, (superior and inferior) do not change or alter their obligations. 
     The ‘Surcharge Division’ is sanctioned by the Courts to act on their behalf.  The judge even knows all about them and how they work (which proves collusion because he is not supposed to uphold them, they are the ones who supposedly have a claim against you.  His actions and degree of knowledge involving this company proves conflict of interst as well, and most important, they (the accuser against you), the Surcharge or DMV Agency, is not even in the court room to substantiate their claim against you.  --This is unlawful. 
     The Mailing Locations:  The accused (you) are given the alleged address of the Surcharge Division as the recipient of fees and imposts that you must pay.  Then the Department of Motor Vehicles commands and threatens you to send finances or fees to them, which is another party, with a different address. (conspiratorial extortion).  We haven't added the courts and the court fees, etc., they are in on the extortion as well, pretending that they are executing law.   Ignornance of the law is no excuse, and in this case the one who suffers from that knowledge is YOU.  This is why we are sharing this information to assist, and to enforce the Constitutional principles that protect the people, as in enforcing it, no one will be molested, and their rights will not be turned into a crime.   (Note:  Turning rights into a crime is a big money maker for them, and let's face it for some of our own, because as long as we continue to sell the birthright by selling it on paper, we are committing a crime, "Slave trade"). 
     Keep in mind that the word, ‘Fee’ is relative to Feudal Law, and Feudal Law is the ‘opposite’ of Allodial.  Such an act is repulsive to Constitutional Principles.  The Surcharge Division or agency is different and separate from the Department of Motor Vehicles, (proving conspiracy to extort and, will and intent).  The State of New Jersey is an artificial ‘Person’ or ‘Entity' (as is any corporate state) created on paper by legal process, and should always be referred to as such. .
(Note:  The State of New Jersey, Incorporated, changed the name of their Motor Vehicle Agency from New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC), not to be confused with (MVS), which is their Surcharge Division.  In the State of New York, the “Surcharge Agency” is referred to, or called, ‘The Ticket Violations Bureau’.)  

So what is Conspiracy?
. Conspiracy:  Is a combination or an agreement made or initiated between two or more persons, for accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by way of unlawful means.  .The essence of “conspiracy: is an agreement, together with an overt act, to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act in an unlawful manner.  Actors may drop out, and others may drop in; the details may change from time to time; and the members need not know each other or the part played by others; a member need not know all the details of the plan or the operations; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a party to a plan to effectuate that purpose. 
Further, conspiracy is a consultation or agreement between two or more persons either falsely to accuse another of a crime punishable by law; or wrongfully to injure or prejudice a third person or any body of men, in any manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent to prevent the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent, or by improper means.

     Another example of the practiced fraud is when the officers or agents initiate and or go into the publicly—funded court rooms, using the courts to enforce “Color of Law”.  They will insistently start telling you (the accused) how much you are going to pay them for the so-called listed infractions and violations.  They (the judges, prosecutors and other court officers) try to roll right over you, while, in the same instance, violating the ‘due - process’ restrictions placed upon them by law.  You (the accused) must be aware that they (the judges, prosecutors, policemen, etc.) are knowingly ignoring, violating, and trampling over established ‘due process’ obligations and ‘Stare Decisis’, secured for the natural People and citizens, by law.  See Amendments IV, V, Vi, VII, VIII, IX, and X, etc.  Don't let their corruption go on unchallenged or un-rebutted.  Do not be afraid of the alleged "trial", as the transcripts (containing your proper questioning and statements) at the pseudo-trial would expose them and their criminality to others and to the Supreme Court (Original Jurisdiction). 
     Transcripts and documented records related to the process will (in future examinations) expose your lawful position, vs. their unlawful practices. These facts have been, and are, usually suppressed by them (the officers of the fraud-based courts). They do not want that information exposed to the public or to a higher court, by way of Mandamus.  If you (the accused) think you are going to a legitimate trial, as the conspiring officers have implied, and threatened you with, then consider this:  Pre-produce 12 copies of the documents and records for the (alleged) jury of your own national peers.  Demand that you preserve your rights to participate in the selection of the jury, with your Moorish Consul present (Ministers / Grand Sheiks, etc.).  They have the authoritative right to be a part of the due—process rights preserved for them to select, screen, question, and critique the alleged jury of your peers.
     One clear and pertinent question already looms over the process—Who are the people that the officers of the court are alleging to be your peers? Are they truly Aboriginal Americans, or are these persons actually colonial imposters and foreigners posing (fraudulently) as Americans (Al Moroccans)?  The plot begins to thicken, doesn’t it?!  Review the laws of evidence as expressed in the legal definition of ‘Identity’.
     Furthermore, and in the interest of universal Justice, it is important for all Moorish - Americans to know (factually) that ‘Traffic Courts’ are ‘Administrative Courts’.  These private corporate courts cannot lawfully have or initiate a trial, exercising judicial powers.  They are essentially kangaroo courts.  It is also important to know that you (the accused) already have and possess rights to travel the public roadways and highways of the Land.  If the Natural People were to all collectively exercise these rights, we wouldn’t be easily subjected to these unlawful processes.
     There is more information and ‘Stare Decisis’ law presented on this subject.  Upon further research, you will find many Supreme Court rulings preserving the Substantive Rights of the people.  In regards to not utilizing the “fraud-based driving instruments” imposed upon the people, the information contained herein must be understood by the people collectively in order for them to lawfully exercise rights already belonging to them.  Keep in mind (those of you who currently have those imposed instruments of converted rights) that just because you do have them in your possession, doesn’t mean or establish that you have knowingly or willingly given up or waived any of your Unalienable Rights.  Always sign any instruments placed before you by agencies, or any Officers of the Corporate State of New Jersey (or any other States), with “all rights reserved”.  (See "How To Live Within Contracts” on the Open Readings Page).
     Another dirty trick, initiated by corporate thieves in seats of municipal governments is when they ask you:  “Do you waive your Right to Counsel?”  Do not fall for this deception.  You may possibly assume that your are denying their court-appointed attorney.  When in reality, if you agree to “waive your right to counsel”, you have done just that—waived your right.  This is why they will not let any other person be your consul when you ‘present’ yourself “In Propria Persona”.  Do not transfer or waive any rights, or give (leave) to any 'colorable' persons or entities present or not present in the 'Administrative Court'. 
This deceptive offer, is designed to gain jurisdictional authority by oral agreement.  It is a jurisdictional contract offer, given under coercion and imposed duress.   Never waive your right to counsel (rightfully, Consul), and in fact, state for the record, your name and Nationality, and state that you do not, did not, and do not intend to ever waive any of your secured rights to due process.
The valid venue of proper jurisdiction must be secured by the Officers of the Court, upon your demand. 
     As per the Constitution, you have a pre-existing Right to Consul.  Do not allow the judge or prosecutor (both being officers of the Barrister’s Association), solicit from the bench, sales and offers from that conflict of interest, private club.  Do not allow these ‘colored’ persons decide who will be your consul / counsel.  They are already operating in a verifiable state of “conflict of Interest”. Do not let or trust them to tell you the truth about their obligations, or to inform you that you have to have someone who is (allegedly) licensed to ‘practice’ law. The Congress does not, and the Constitution does not, license lawyers; because there is no such thing as a license to practice law.  The law (Constitution) is common to every free national being.  There is no  political or religious test or requirement to have a ‘license’ in order to exercise, enjoy, or to command the enforcement of the law (Constitution, Bill of Rights and Treaties).  Do not believe me - ask these administrative accusers to show you documented proof by Exhibit, their license to practice law.  They, in turn, will not; they cannot; and they do not; because such instruments do not exist.  And this is the FACT.  They (the Attorneys or other Officers of the Court) may show you (under the rule of Discovery) a “Bar Association Membership Card” which they also are loath to do.  However that instrument is not a license, and is far from an alleged license.  Such instruments are private club—member, dues paying, agreements, which have nothing to do with Constitutional Obligations (Articles III and VI) and are merely membership cards issued by private corporate interests, and officers of the Barristers Association — a private and exclusive club.
.      .
The responsibilities to be active and to study do not end at this juncture.   Peace!  

About Dismissal Affidavits
The following Affidavits / Writs are for Ticket Dismissals and present Law - Supports for Dismissal.  The Natural Person is advised to submit the Affidavits / Writs to the Prosecutor and other court officers prior to the court date.  In fact, most of the time, send your Writs in by Certified Mail within 3 days after you receive the municipality's instruments. With proper correspondence, you will, sometimes, receive a favorable reply, and won't have to come into the non- Article III court room.  If you are in a situation wherein you bring Writs with you, be sure to serve a copy to the Clerk for filing with the case.  Some clerks may try to tell you that they cannot receive your Writs, however, it is a violation of the Clerk's fudiciary duties to deny the Writs of Evidence related to the case.  Be sure to have the Ticket / Summons / Suit number(s) listed at the top of your Writs / Affidavits, listing them and all other documented entries with numbers, such as, Exhibit 1; Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3, etc., etc. Remember, your Exhibits / Writs / Affidavits are instruments of Facts and when marked as Exhibits it makes them a part of the "case", and the officers of the court are obliged to receive them, otherwise they are tampering with evidence. 
The reason they don't want to receive it, is because they are in fact obligated, and they would be responsible, and would be compelled by law to respond.  If you don't submit it, you would be irresponsible.  It is important to submit paperwork, as it becomes your exhibits, and is your paper trail (whether they accept, or act on it or not).  The paper trail is necessray, copying it to at least 3 different Persons / Corporations / Agencies.  In particular, the Clerk, the Judge of the said city / municipality / township, and a copy to the State Attorney General's Office, as well as the State Secretary, as a minimum of three AND the Governor's Office, particularly when dealing with so-named higher Courts such as Federal.  This notifies other departments and makes it difficult for all of them to ignore their fiduciary duties, and it sets up your paper trail for when you suit them, otherwise you have no proof of their violations, or of your actions.  If you put them on file at the court, make sure they stamp your copy "received" with a date.    
1.  Willie Lynch TEST

1.  Grren Ball