Wednesday, January 2, 2019

U.S. Inc. or Corporation or Artificial or Person or Enemy or Gov. says you are a dead vessel lost at sea.

Your legal name is the name that the government uses to identify you. Most of us have been conditioned to think that our legal names are actually who we are. In reality, our legal names are not who we are because each of us is a man or woman with a body made of flesh and blood. 

Names are not real, living and breathing people, but instead are symbols of things (non-beings). In legal terms, names are artificial persons which are corporations. In other words, your legal name represents the corporate name that is used by the government to identify you.
The evidence that names are artificial persons can be found in the legal definition of the word name. Black’s Law Dictionary (6th edition) defines the word name using these exact words: “The designation of an individual person, or of a firm or corporation.” The word corporation is defined by the same law dictionary as, “An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state.” Based on the definitions in this paragraph, in law, a name can be a corporation which is an artificial person.

Did You Know the Government is Also a Corporation?

Like your legal name, the government is also not “real” because it is a corporation. In the “United States”, the U.S. government is actually a foreign corporation with respect to a state. Click here to see the evidence. Because the government is a corporation (artificial person), it is a fictitious entity that has no natural rights and power. Its main source of power comes from feeding on the energy of the people.
Because the government is a corporation or fictitious entity, it can not think, speak, see, touch, smell, or do anything that a living man can do. As a result of that, the government can only operate in a fictional world. To function in the real world, it needs a conduit or a liaison of some sort to connect it to the world of living and breathing people.
Since the government can not deal directly with the real you made of flesh and blood, it needs to trick you to agree to be a conduit or a liaison so it can connect you to the fictional government. This conduit is the legal person/legal fiction or legal name, the name written in all capital letters. This legal name is not you but is a fictitious entity used by the government to do business with you.
The moment you agree to be the legal fiction/legal name, you create a contract that connects you to the legal fiction/legal name. This allows the government to do business with you. It also allows the government and the court to have jurisdiction over you. However, when you know how to exercise your natural rights, you can void the contract anytime you want.
Here is an excerpt from Chapter 3 (The Legal Name Game) of my Amazon best seller book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Wordsthat exposes the hidden agenda of the legal name and birth certificate.
In commerce, when you see a name written in all capital letters, it is a corporate name or a legal name which is a corporation. The legal name plays a significant role in your life because it is used by the government as a conduit or liaison, so that it can do business with you (the living man). This is why whenever the government, bank, or any corporation sends you a document with your legal name on it, 99 percent of the time it is written in all capital letters.
The process that allows the government to legally claim you as a corporate entity involves the creation of a fictional character, and then tricking you to consent to be that fictional character, which is the artificial person or legal name. This legal name was created shortly after you were born and was recorded on a bond. This bond that represents the date of your birth is known as your birth certificate.
The word bond is legally defined as “a contract by specialty to pay a certain sum of money; being a deed or instrument under seal, by which the maker or obligor promises, and thereto binds himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, to pay a designated sum of money to another; usually with a clause to the effect that upon performance of a certain condition (as to pay another and smaller sum) the obligation shall be void”.

The Difference Between the United States of America (Major) and the United States of America (Minor)

When I say the “United States, 
” I am talking about the “Federal United States” or the “United States of America, Inc.” and not the United States of America (unincorporated). The United States of America, Inc. is doing business as the United States of America (Minor) and has a total of 57 states. As for the United States of America (unincorporated), it is doing business as The United States of America (Major) and is made up of 50 separate nation states.
The United States of America, Inc. or the United States of America (Minor) has unlawfully taken over The United States of America (Major) more than a century ago. The act that made this possible was the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, also known as the Act of 1871. As a result of that, anyone who becomes a United States citizen is considered by the U.S. government as a citizen (“employee”) of the corporation called the United States, Inc., also doing business as the United States of America, Inc.
The United States of America, Inc. resides in Washington D.C., which is a district that has a 10 mile radius. This district is not part of The United States of America (Major). In other words, the United States of America, Inc. is a foreign corporation. Any American who has sworn a solemn oath to this corporation has basically committed treason against The United States of America (Major).
To agree to be a United States citizen means that you agree to act in the capacity of an “employee” of the United States of America Inc. Like any employee of a corporation (i.e., Walmart and Target), you have to follow the rules of the United States of America, Inc. According to the rules of this corporation, you have no rights, only privileges, just like an employee of any corporation.

Your Legal Name is a Name of a Corporation

One of the ways to tell if a name on a government document (i.e., driver’s license, social security card and birth certificate) is a corporate name is to look at the name to see if it is written in all capital letters. If it is written in all capital letters, nearly 99 percent of the time it is a corporate name. It is important to know that even when your name is not written in all capital letters it could still represent a corporation. Once you understand this process, you should know that your legal name is often written in all capital letters because it has been incorporated and securitized so it can be used in commerce.
Another reason why your legal name is often written in all capital letters is because capital letters are more effective for creating magic spells! Your birth certificate with your legal name written on it is not just a record of birth; it is also a spiritual contract that is bound to magic. This is why there are sigils (seals) on your birth certificate.

Sunday, December 23, 2018

RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT A LICENSE


https://youtu.be/cV8gRA-JYeg?t=288




SOVEREIGNTY FOR POLICE OFFICERS



https://youtu.be/qFDWYLWiE1I?t=2

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Tim Turner Freedom Seminar (2009) Part 1

Monday, December 10, 2018

500 Years No Justice - Cease & Desist Brutality

500 Years No Justice - Cease & Desist Brutality

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

U.S. COURT DECISIONS CONFIRM "DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE" IS A CITIZENS RIGHT AND NOT A GOVERNMENT GRANTED PRIVILEGE.


U.S. COURT DECISIONS CONFIRM "DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE" IS A CITIZENS RIGHT
AND NOT A GOVERNMENT GRANTED PRIVILEGE.

The American Citizens and Lawmen Association in conjunction with The U.S. Federal Law Research Center are presently involved in studies in several areas involving questions on constitutional law. One of the many areas under review is the area of "Citizens right to travel." In an interview a spokesmen stated: "Upon researching this subject over many months, substantial case law has presented itself that completely substantiates the position that the "right to travel unrestricted upon the nation’s highways" is and has always been a fundamental right of every Citizen."

UCC PP § 9-109.14A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, it is NOT a type of automobile required to be “registered” and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.”
 Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14.
This means that the "beliefs and opinions" our state legislators, the courts, and those of as involved in the law enforcement profession have acted upon for years have been in error. Researchers armed with actual facts state that U.S. case law is overwhelming in determining that - to restrict, in any fashion, the movement of the individual American in the free exercise of their right to travel upon the roadways, (excluding "commerce" which the state Legislatures are correct in regulating), is a serious breach of those freedoms secured by the U.S. Constitution, and most state Constitutions, i.e - it is Unlawful.
Citizens of the states have a right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Here are other court decisions that expound the same facts:

Case # 1 - "Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. - Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22 
("Regulated" here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.)
Case # 2 - "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."- Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579.
Case # 3 - "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the 5th Amendment." Kent v Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.
Case # 4 - "Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal Liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution." Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.

The United States Supreme Court has held that "the right of locomotion”, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty." Williams v. Fears 179 U.S. 270, 21 S. Ct.128; see Papachristou v. Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 164, 92 S. Ct. 839; Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 126, 78 S. Ct. 1113; see also Johnson v. City of Cincinnati 310 F.3d 484, 6th Cir. 2002 (Constitution protects right to travel locally through public spaces and roadways).

In California, a LICENSE is defined as -- "A  permit, granted  by an appropriate governmental body, generally for a consideration, to a person or firm, or corporation to pursue some occupation or to carry on some business subject to regulation under the police power." Rosenblatt v. California, 158 P2d 199, 300.
"The license is designed to operate upon those who hold themselves out as common carriers, and a license may be exacted from such as a proper exercise of police power; but no reason exists why it should be applied to the owners of private vehicles, used for their individual use exclusively, in their own business, or for their own pleasure, as a means of locomotion." City of Chicago vs. Collins et al., Supreme Court of Illinois. 175 Ill. 445, 51 N.E. 907 (Oct. 24, 1898).

ONLY government (municipal corporations) employees can pass legislate laws to limit themselves. State Citizens are NOT employees of government nor can they be forced into these political subdivisions against their will. These unnecessary and illegitimate regulations include driver licenses, vehicle plates, seat belts, traffic red light cams. These "codes" are for government revenue only.  Republic CANNOT put limits on the natural born state Citizens because they are SOVEREIGN and free.

No STATE may/can compel us to put our otherwise private property into use/service as commercial property. THAT transaction has to be 100% voluntary. And, it is, because it's evaluated by the "objective standard" associated with "this state" (a body of law that is counter-intuitive to us) rather than the "subjective standard" which is associated with the Law of the Land (also known as Common law).
You have the right to travel without a "license" or permission from the government, as long as you are not using the roadways to conduct commercial activity. 

If you are not engaged in commerce on the road you do not need to have a driver license because you are not driving, you are traveling. A driver license is only needed for the driver of a motor vehicle which is taking part in commerce. The act of obtaining a driver license (giving up you’re right to free travel) shall make one liable to the "vehicle code" of the state. 

Government, in requiring the people to file for "drivers licenses, vehicle registrations, mandatory insurance, and demanding they stop for vehicle inspections, DUI roadblocks etc. without question, are "restricting", and therefore violating, the Peoples common law right to travel. 

There is no lawful method for government to put restrictions or Limitations on rights belonging to the people

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

"The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege  which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common Right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
"Thompson vs. Smith, 154 SE 579.

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.· -
 Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights."- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945. ( There is no question that a citation/ticket issued by a police officer, for no driver license, no current vehicle registration, no vehicle insurance etc. which carries a fine or jail time, is a penalty or sanction, and is indeed "converting a Right into a crime".)

Many of our courts, attorneys and police officials are just becoming informed about this important issue and the difference between "Privileges vs. Rights". 

We can assume that the majority of those Americans carrying state licenses, vehicle registrations etc., have no knowledge of the rights they waived in obeying laws such as these that the U.S. Constitution clearly states are unlawful, i.e. "laws of no effect". In other words - "LAWS THAT ARE NOT LAWS AT ALL."

If a state legislator, judge or a superior tells a police officer to proceed and enforce a contradictory, (illegal), state law rather than the Supreme Law of this country, what is that "sworn officer" to do? Although we may not want to hear it, there is but one right answer, - "the officer is duty bound to uphold his oath of office" and obey the highest laws of the nation. THIS IS OUR SWORN DUTY AND IT'S THE LAW!

In any legal stand-off over a sworn official "violating" or "upholding" their oath of office, those that would side with the "violation" should inevitable lose.
Every police officer should keep the following court ruling; that was covered earlier, in mind before issuing citations in regard to "mandatory licensing, registration and insurance" - verses - "the right of the people to travel unencumbered":

"THE CLAlM AND EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RlGHT CANNOT BE CONVERTED INTO A CRIME." - Miller v U.S., 230 F 2d 486. 489.

You have the right to travel without a "license" or permission from the government, as long as you are not using the roadways to conduct commercial activity. If you are not engaged in commerce on the road you do not need to have a driver license because you are not driving, you are traveling. A driver license is only needed for the driver of a motor vehicle which is taking part in commerceThe act of obtaining a driver license (giving up you’re right to free travel) shall make one liable to the "vehicle code" of the state. 

LAW CODES/WORDS DEFINITIONS
STATE /FEDERAL

An AUTOMOBILE has been defined as:
"The word 'automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200.

A "vehicle" is something used for "transportation," which is a line of commercial activity that involves the removing of people and/or goods from here to there for profit or hire under a choice of law of the "place" called "this state."

"Traveler” One who passes from place to place, whether for pleasure, instruction, business, or health." Locket vs. State, 47 Ala. 45; Bovier's Law Dictionary, 1914 ed., p. 3309.
"Travel” To journey or to pass through or over; as a country district, road, etc. To go from one place to another, whether on foot, or horseback, or in any conveyance as a train, an automobile, carriage, ship, or aircraft; make a journey." Century Dictionary, p.2034.
To further clarify the definition of an "operator" the court observed that this was a vehicle "for hire" and that it was in the business of carrying passengers.

U.C.C.  ARTICLE 9. PART 1. § 9-109. -- Classification of Goods: “Consumer Goods”; “Equipment”; “Inventory”. Goods are;  “consumer goods” if they are used or bought for use primarily for personal, family or household purposes; Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his place of Employment was ``consumer goods Mallicoat v Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv 1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn. App., 1966).

USC Title 18 §31(6) Motor vehicle. The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

USC Title 49 §30301(4) ``motor vehicle'' means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semi-trailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used on public streets, roads, or highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line.

Monday, November 26, 2018

Changing Legal Status - Practical Matters