Sunday, July 14, 2019


                               DO YOU KNOW WHO OWNS YOUR CAR?
If you want to learn how Government and Courts work, you better know                                                                       "LEGALEASE"

This is how CA. DMV auto registration works and the other 48 States.
The process begins with the "surrender" of the Manufacturer's Statement of Origin (MSO) by the auto dealer to the State Department of Revenue in exchange for Certificate of Title. The MSO is the legal proof of ownership - Legal title - to the automobile.

The the dealership receives money for registering their (The State) vehicle (not yours) with the DMV. In CA. Its Just like when hospitals demand you fill out a Birth Cert. It's all voluntarily, you don't need a birth cert. to live your life. The Government pays hospitals for every original Birth Cert. they recieve. What you get is a copy of your birth cert. The original is sent to Social Security Office main building located in Puerto Rico. But that's a whole nother discussion.
A law working its way through legislation in CA. will make it mandatory for car dealerships to register their vehicle before you drive it off the lot.
The PINK SLIP to a automobile is NOT title; it's merely evidence that a title exists. The car legal ownership TITLE is the MSO, which the dealer surrendered to the State. The MSO is put on microfilm for permanent keeping, the original is destroyed to keep you from getting it.
People are shocked what they thought was their personal automobiles is actually owned by the State. "No wonder some State laws allow officers to stop vehicles for no reason!" It's their property. "If your car's has a license plate, it's theirs, and they can do anything they like to the vehicle." That's why you need a driver license, registration, and insurance, The State requires employees to have those if you drive their company car. Your just driving a State owned vehicle that you paid for. That's the law.

It's all voluntary. You voluntary signed for the driver license. Nobody forced you to get one. Now your thinking "But, I had to in order to drive a vehicle." No! Only if your driving commercial.
                                          READY FOR THE GREAT PART?
                                          (CAN'T BE A USED VEHICLES)

Since 1952, Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) have been established as law with the goal of harmonizing the laws of sales and other commercial transactions across the United States of America, and the U.S..
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, . . . it is NOT a type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14.
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20.
“The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.” Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
The exemptions provided for in section 1 of the Motor Vehicle Transportation License Act of 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 833) in favor of those who solely transport their own property or employees, or both, and of those who transport no persons or property for hire or compensation, by motor vehicle, have been determined in the Bacon Service Corporation case to be lawful exemptions. --In re Schmolke (1926) 199 Cal. 42, 46.
“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them.” --State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94, page 581.
“The classification of goods in UCC §9-109 are mutually exclusive.” McFadden v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273 A.2d 198 (1971).
“Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his place of employment was ``consumer goods'' as defined in UCC §9-109.” Mallicoat v Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv 1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn. App., 1966). 
                                   CASE LAW AND SOURCES BELOW:

Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14.
Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20
Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825,
Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907).
Motor Vehicle Transportation License Act of 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 833)
Schmolke (1926) 199 Cal. 42, 46.
State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94, page 581.

UCC Article 9. Part 1. § 9-102 (23), 9-109.

Title 49 § 523.3 (Automobile)
(a) An automobile is any 4-wheeled vehicle that is propelled by fuel, or by alternative fuel, manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways and rated at less than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight,

49 CFR § 397.65 (Motor vehicle)
Motor vehicle means -- Any vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used upon the highways in the transportation of passengers or property, or any combination thereof.

49 CFR § 390.5 (Commercial vehicle)
Commercial motor vehicle means -- any self-propelled or towed motor vehicle used on a highway in interstate commerce to transport passengers or property when the vehicle - (1) Has a gross vehicle weight rating or gross combination weight rating, (10,001 pounds) or more,

49 CFR § 390.5 (Driver)
Driver means -- any person who operates any commercial motor vehicle.

Sunday, June 23, 2019

REMEDY; Article III state Judiciary Court WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308

 state Judiciary Court
UCC 1-308
Special Appearance In Propria Persona to challenge jurisdiction of agency Without Prejudice UCC 1-308.
Agency of State is commercial Charter of Maritime jurisdiction;
I hereby refute agency
terms of Uniform Commercial Code 3-104 “promise”
 and reject “unconditional”
instruments as “unconscionable” at UCC 2-302.

The Constitution is not a defense in “satisfaction and accord” commercial venture unless “dishonor” of negotiable instrument is in dispute or fraudulently represented. If no contract exists, there cannot be an “action” to force acceptance of obligation if the Citizen remains In Propria Persona upon a license or summons.In Propria Persona upon an instrument would look like this; “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308,” written above your signature reverts the burden of proof and places terms upon agency. Individual terms are non-negotiable with agent/police power and must be accepted. The Citizen is then protected by the very statute meant to subject him to jurisdiction of commercial agency for same is non-assumpsit. Agency charter must follow U.C. Code or suffer the wrath of Their father.
Black’s Law 5th: In Propria Persona. “In ones own proper person. It was a former rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is free to answer charges after “taking leave” of the accused, which admits the jurisdiction.”
In Propria Persona is “in your forehead” and guides your fleshy “right hand” to worship foreign instruments which causes your heart and Soul worry by subjecting your flesh “in-personam” to slavery. In-personam admits to the jurisdiction because you waived the wisdom of God and the Bill of Rights by accepting those of the 14th Amendment for Federal citizen “privilege and benefit.” Your attorney speaks for you by procedural process and knows nothing of God or The Bill of Rights.
Black’s Law 5th : Non-assumpsit. “The general issue in the action of assumpsit; being a plea by which the defendant avers that “he did not [knowingly] undertake or promise as alleged.”
When the Citizen is aware of a controversy regarding agency practice, they may elect to protect their In Propria Persona Citizenship status. Writing/signature upon a “required” “unconscionable” unit of Without Prejudice UCC 1-308 will render the unit non-assumpsit and reserves Rights upon the instrument. The non-assumpsit does not grant “satisfaction and accord” to agency. Thereby no expectation or “promise” at UCC 3-104.3.
Taxes do not buy anything; they only perpetuate inferior Article II Executive Departments to acquire more “persons” to collect them for Article I Congress. The People get raises on wages, rent, taxes, and insurance at the pleasure of the Federal Reserve. The wage earner is the most studied of mankind and risk loss in case of financial emergency. Insurance, interest rates, and medical expenses take the very little left over pocket money. Agency is very aware of this matrix but do not offer relief or even an ear. “Obligation of Contract” at Article I, Sec. 10, Cl.1, is the Law of the land, even if Admiralty has a claim. We Thee People must watch the wall of Truth, for when agency demands obedience, We The People must pray for proper knowledge.
Many purchase what they may because their money does not cause inflation. Citizens who toil daily and pay the IRS the price of a car payment or bicycle are the ones who cause inflation. We The People are in control of the buying if and when we may save enough to finance a vehicle, television or refrigerator. Agency is in charge of how much we purchase by using the tax to control this everyday life sequence.
Our seniors live on fixed income and their spare money is doled to the pharmaceutical manufacturing stockholders which operates against the “taxpayer” by using the same spending principal. The Federal Reserve knows exactly how much money those on Social Security have and the agency pays out according to the stress matrix of the senior “class.” The proof is; Canada sells U.S. drugs at far less than the price that Americans may purchase them in the U.S. There are two laws of this principle; Power and Greed and power and greed. No “benefit” because the “taxpayer” is tithing the wrong Master.
“Righteous” men had “entrusted” the Peoples” Lawful money to usury by devise long before the Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Devise was a reality. The “Great Depression” should have been the first sign of today’s resultant agency power. Congress controls the flow of F.R.A.U.D.s through their banks by raising and lowering insurance, interest and taxes. “District” circumstances may be manipulated by agency to take advantage of currency issues involved with as little as the Red Cross and as much as the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Mortgages, tuition, and taxes endanger the Citizen with threat of loss through foreclosure, confiscation of equipment, children or a ferret in the State of California. Households must “work” all hands in order to survive and pay interest and taxes. Farmers lose vast acreage for lack of Frauds and thereby agency bankers, bond holders and insurance companies prosper.
Many Patriots have fallen pray to the 13th Amendment with their lives, property and Spirit. Those who seek Truth must be made aware of their “worship” to this “procedural” Penumbra of “inferior” officers and agency courts. The individual must gain knowledge of agency and rid themselves of their inequity or be enslaved by adhesions far greater than now exist.
Black’s Law 5th: Penumbra Doctrine. “The implied powers of the federal government predicated on the Necessary and Proper Clause of the U.S. Const., Art. I, Sec.8 (18), permit one implied power to be engrafted on another implied power.” Kohl v. U.S., 91 U.S. 367, 23 L.Ed. 449.  Kohl v. US, (1875)
This is a “stare decisis” or bench statute and does not apply to Article III Judicial Power or “natural born Citizens” of the respective states. Article I Legislative and Article II Executive are the implied powers which are engrafted at the “inferior” Fed/State forum court. A contract of corporate cause from Article I delict gives police power to agency via Article II Executive and puts the burden on the Citizen to prove he has not violated an agreement. Penumbra Doctrine does not include Article III, which is not an “implied” power.
Article I, Sec. 8 Cl. (1), “The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, and Impost and Excises.”
None of these constitute wages or Right to employment and church without agency License. Neither is Congress authorized to delegate tax authority to any of the other “implied powers.” The Penumbra Doctrine allowed “implied powers” to be “engrafted.” Article II Executive to collect the tax with “implied” police power, but no delict to destroy diversity of Citizenship. Article I Legislative is the other “implied” power and together makes third party instruments “presumed” to obligate the state dispense Law Merchant procedureThird party units are voidable and both inferior powers must prove their jurisdiction to use the police power enabling clauses within their own system charter.
An Article I witness must verify accuracy and validity of its commercial “officer of the court” summons to the proper “persons.” Article II Executive must witness to the validity of proper instruments agency is “carrying into effect” and validate the unit’s application to the proper subject and class. Article III Judicial will not be present, only commercial entities are subject to procedural due process “justice.” All accusers within a commercial forum have a sworn duty as “officers of the court” to protect both Articles. All three Separation of Powers are required as witness and officials in a state Court. A state Court using Federal Rules are of the Penumbra Doctrine and may be made totally “dead in Law” by a Citizen who reserves his Rights to state Court.
The Department of Justice uses Federal Code of Civil Procedure and only has de jure power over subject corporations and resident persons “within the jurisdiction of the United States'” Territorial limits, “(not exceeding ten Miles square)” of the Washington “District.” Police power is presumed to apply to the “natural person” via summons, actions, and presentments which are contracts of Maritime nexus and require a “respondent” to prove innocence or “dishonor” of contractual “promise” will issue. The Citizen is presumed to know what has “made liable” there “in-personam,” and police power will “Miranda” your answers to the proper authorities for “scourging.”
Simply responding to summons, presentments, depositions or refusing to enter a plea are all tacit admissions to the jurisdiction of the court. Try throwing a presentment in the trash and it will haunt you when the judge certifies payment is due for evasion. “Dishonor” will be verified if the Citizen does not respond with Rights reserved upon the negotiable summons/instrument/claim.
Black’s Law 5th: In-personam. “The action in personam is that by which we sue him who is under obligation to do something or give something.”
A W-4/summons/license is presumed to be voluntary, knowingly, willingly and intentionally signed by the Citizen.  A negotiable instrument is Constitutional, no matter what Rights the Citizen is restricted from uttering, for same are waived and therefore frivolous. “Obligation of Contract” applies to all parties. Article III is bared from interfering due to the Separation of Powers and lack of nexus, no matter which class of Citizen has promised to “benefit.” Unconstitutional will not serve Remedy to an “unconditional” and voluntarily signed contract. Maritime Jurisdiction is not in the business of advising its “clients” how to protect their Bill of Rights upon any negotiable contract. Emphasis added!
The Citizen may remain In Propria Persona and have the same “benefit” of license if he desires.  The W-4, summons, or license to practice medicine, pilot, or contract may be made non-assumpsit by the individual Citizen who is knowledgeable in the Law.
Black’s Law 5th: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “Body of procedural rules which govern all civil actions in U. S. District Courts and after which most of the states have modeled their own rules of procedure. These rules were promulgated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1938 under power granted by Congress, and have since been frequently amended. Such rules also govern bankruptcy proceedings in the bankruptcy courts; and, Supplemental Rules, in addition to main body of rules, govern admiralty and maritime actions.”
Thereby the gold fringe which has federalized the state courthouse flag with “forum” Article I Legislated statutes of Congress and Article II Department of Justice Admiralty procedures. The activation clause for police power is by the hand of the contracted “subject,” which assents to agency idolatry. Congress contracts police power when “dishonor” of its instruments may be verified for “reasonable cause” to believe the tax, summons, or license has not been paid as promised by the “subject” Citizen. (Note: Waiver of a right may likewise be presumed, which would require a signature on a waiver form such as application for a “Driver” license. The state can’t contract at this level, as there is no authorized representative to sign the contract . . . so thereby, a unilateral waiver of right must suffice. At this point, is when it becomes necessary to rescind all signatures that may have waived a right. Reliance of a waived right(s) must be produced when demanded.
Article II D.O.J. lends its “implied power” Penumbra to execute procedures for collection, which violate the Separation of Powers Doctrine. If the Citizen does not have knowledge of the transgression, so be it, for the Citizen is presumed to know the Law and may not use any other documents to excuse ignorance.
“Subject” citizens are bound to follow procedural rules in civil actions, even if they do not speak the dialect or understand the law. When the Natural state Citizen remains In Propria Persona, Article III Judiciary requires “probable cause” or Citizen may not be “held” prior to “indictment” of The People per the 5th Amendment. A state Citizen is only as free as his knowledge of elliptical Citizenship devise within agency contract. A state Citizen is not required to follow Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for same are “without” jurisdiction. If voluntary assent is subscribed by non-disclosure or fraudulent representation, the contract is a nullity and “dead in Law” when the instrument is brought before the proper Tribunal as “unconscionable.”
Your state “modeled” their procedures which are “necessary and proper” to qualify for Fed funds to build the courthouse to try the state Citizen and “occupation” Territory per District statute. Federal Rules within a state court will not convince God of His Peoples Liberty.

The Masted Federal flag is warning to all; Maritime Jurisdictional Civil Law will dispense “forum” procedural “due process” to any who enter by contract or “tacit” compliance. The state only has the presumed power over the Citizen when Maritime jurisdiction has been empowered by “subject matter and in-persona jurisdiction” at Rule 12 (b) which delict false citizenship and obligates We The People as “subjects.”
 Federal Rule 12 Defenses and Objections-(b) “_the following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: lack of jurisdiction over subject matter. (commercial “class”)
lack of jurisdiction over the person (contracted artificial subject v. natural born)a motion making any of these defenses shall be made before pleading.
(Administrative level) (h) (3) “Whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.”

HISTORY: (Amended Mar. 19, 1948; July 1, 1963; July 1, 1966; Aug. 1, 1987; Dec. 1, 1993)
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules.
Note to Subdivision (a).
Amended subdivision (h)(1)(A) eliminates the ambiguity and states that certain specified defenses which were available to a party when he made a pre answer motion, but which he omitted from the motion, are waived. The specified defenses are lack of jurisdiction over the person, improper venue, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of process (see Rule 12(b)(2)–(5)). A party who by motion invites the court to pass upon a threshold defense should bring forward all the specified defenses he then has and thus allow the court to do a reasonably complete job. The waiver reinforces the policy of subdivision (g) forbidding successive motions.
By amended subdivision (h)(1)(B), the specified defenses, even if not waived by the operation of (A), are waived by the failure to raise them by a motion under Rule 12 or in the responsive pleading or any amendment thereof to which the party is entitled as a matter of course. The specified defenses are of such a character that they should not be delayed and brought up for the first time by means of an application to the court to amend the responsive pleading.
Since the language of the subdivisions is made clear, the party is put on fair notice of the effect of his actions and omissions and can guard himself against unintended waiver. It is to be noted that while the defenses specified in subdivision (h)(1) are subject to waiver as there provided, the more substantial defenses of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, failure to join a party indispensable under Rule 19, and failure to state a legal defense to a claim (see Rule 12(b)(6), (7), (f)), as well as the defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter (see Rule 12(b)(1)), are expressly preserved against waiver by amended subdivisions (h)(2) and (3).
 In military terms, the prisoner must be remanded to a state court for Remedy. State court requires indictment by the People and Probable cause to issue a warrant. No “crime” has been committed within the jurisdiction of the People and the subject matter cannot “go forward” for no “verified complaint” exists and the court is entirely without “cause of action.”
“Without Prejudice” UCC 1-308 is much more than a “suggestion” when written above your signature. A reservation of Rights vitiates the W-4/license/summons by placing a non-assumpsit “condition” upon the now non-negotiable unit at UCC 3-104.2. The “promise” of UCC 3-104.3 is void ab initio and cannot “make liable” the “promise” under penalty of perjury at UCC 3-104.3. No performance is required for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as “lawful money of the United States” is not germane to “relief sought.”
Subject matter is as simple as understanding that there must be a contract, summons, or tacit “dishonor” of Maritime jurisdiction. Subject matter is the “nature of cause of actions and of relief sought.”
Black’s Law 5th: Cause. “Something that precedes and brings about; to effect as an agent; to bring into existence; to make to induce; to compel.”
Operating a vehicle on the street “requires” license of commercial operators. Your “unconditional” signature upon the unit gives “police power” to agency per agreement signed with full knowledge of its content. The subject is commercial and you are a card carrying member of Maritime Jurisdiction and “accepting benefit” of “trafficking.”
The Sheriff is the only Constitutional police officer of Article II Executive Branch. The state Citizen who commits a crime against the People must have “indictment” for “cause” to exist; the sheriff is the one who should pick you up. Municipalities and state police are “resident” 14th Amendment due process officers of the court and have very limited jurisdiction, whose subject matter is commercial gain. Vehicles are registered and held in trust by the “trafficker” and the summons is for “failure to perform legal obligation to do, or refrain from performance of, some act” involving State business.
The Citizen must rebut the “cause of action” a little different than Paul did. The Free born must deny all jurisdiction of agency to remain In Propria Persona. We do not accept the “benefit” of agency “due process” and aver to the God given Bill of Rights. By not accepting another “officer of the court” as attorney, agency is estoppel of procedural “due process” by adhesion, for no one has your “power of attorney” to “take leave” of your Bill of Rights.
A Christian Man must be aware of the Spiritual cost of waiving any Rights whatsoever. When asked if the charges are clear, a NO will demand the “cause of action.” The “proof of the matter stated” is contract or lack thereof and a statement of “Without Prejudice” UCC 1-308, I wish to remain silent” will estoppel agency and stay the matter at the administrative level. “Without Prejudice” is “notice” to agency that a “suggestion” has been made to deny jurisdiction per Rule 12 (b). “Color of law” statutes are very clear, and “the court shall dismiss the action.” The judge would violate his oath to act in a personal manner to harm anyone, and “made liable” and “obligated” to the Citizen for violation of Rights. The court officers 12 (6) “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted,” is fatal. The officers “service” of summons would also be flawed if a reservation of Rights were visible above the Citizens signature on W-4/license/summons, for no indictment, no “arrest” by surrogate is admissible.
The Supreme Court only “hears” what it may under guidelines set forth by the commercial agency bringing action. A knowledgeable state Citizen may not be actioned against by “persons” of Federal situs, unless they contract via “unconditional” negotiable units activated by agency executor at “promise.” Supreme Court settles “subject matter” issues between corporate “public policy” and subjects.
A reservation of Rights upon the W-4/license/summons, or ferret bill of sale estoppels the collection executor, for “no verification of negotiability exist”. None may be “made” for you as “single and one dependant.”  Resident subject citizens are obligated by contract and an unauthorized pet may be seized by agency contraband confiscation procedure and “mail box policy” going to fear and intimidation.
The ferret in this case becomes property and probable cause and warrant is required to seize property.The Bill of Rights has already been decided as Law and therefore no reason to go to Court unless indicted by the People for a “crime.”Civil actions are not the laws within the jurisdiction of the Bill of Rights, for same may be amended at Congressional delict. A state Citizen of Article III may seek the “original jurisdiction” of the Supreme Court to protect religious Rights. A state Citizen who is in-personam/contracted to agency admits to the jurisdiction of “subject matter” issues and succumbs to Rule 12 (b).
Amendment I stands on its own as “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishing of religion.” The IRS however, will license Church tithes with IRS Code Section 501 c (3), giving de facto Federal permission to teach and contractual exempt status to accept tithes. Paul was freer than the church and God save us, it should be the other way around. The difference; Paul prayed for the knowledge to free Him, the church does not seek “prognostic counsel” nor does the “authoritive” Shepherd, ASK Luke 11:9.
“It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is … a tacit admission that the court has a right to judge in the case, and is a waiver to all exceptions to the jurisdiction.” Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush Ky. 8.
Jesus made a “tacit” admission to Pilate when he responded to the question; “Art thou the King of the Jews.” “Thou sayest it” was not an admission, nor was it denial, but enough for Pilate to have “clean hands” for the “tacit” answer.The Magistrate was granted permission to heed “public Policy” and judgment was sealed and “legalized.” In today’s court Jesus would have been pled not guilty by the judge and at least would have had a real commercial trial prior to being flogged within Caesars” synagogues. Jesus would have been tried in-personam with “subject matter” contingent upon the prevailing agency procedures of the Tribunal. Procedures forbade those who would be King of anything to utter it even as “tacit” mumble.  Simply stated; a subject may be tried by any agent who has jurisdiction granted him by the victim who has not declared Sovereign Rights. The Tribunal is immune from violating any Rights for same have been waived and issues of status are settled. Speak up, as Paul was instructed and reserve all your Rights with knowledge.
A valid “writing” at UCC 3-104.1, made “unconditional” at 3-104.2, will sustain the “promise” at 3-104.3 regardless of Constitutional arguments by the Patriot. This is jurisdiction of agency over the subject Citizen. Negotiable Instruments Law is UCC 3-104 and agency “must” follow the charter rules of its Master; Congress. Remedy is UCC 1-103.6 for “The code is ‘Complimentary’ to the common law which remains in force except where displaced by the code…”
A Church is not protecting its flock by “exempt” procedural contracts with the IRS. A Church who “must” collect Social Security numbers from an infant is not teaching posterity among the flock. Neither does “head of household” who deducts his infant as a tax benefit. God has allowed us to fail, but now awaits His obedient Children.
Man’s Law has adulterated Gods Holy places and “works” must be completed so the alter is made ready for Christ. Christian Men and Women are not required by God to license any Right. What then gives the Shepherd license to teach with Authority within a synagogue where the “marriage veil” is split for worship of agency; Apocrypha?
Information, Presentment, or any “mail box policy” stands as truth if not rebutted. All Legislated Statutes should be treated as rebutable presumption and harmful to in-personam citizenship. Matters not what agency activity the individual is involved within, jurisdiction can be challenged at any time. “Without prejudice’ UCC 1-308, will stand as rebuttal, ‘answer’ and ‘discovery’ ‘prima facie’ on the Administrative record as notice to ‘abate.”Any of the above creates “estoppel of agency’, when the issue lacks ‘in-personam” jurisdiction. There will be “no cause where relief may be granted” to agency at the administrative level.  Agency gets into much mischief if it attempts to raise a “dead in Law” issue, without assent.
“Remedy” is final within The Uniform Commercial Code. We the People were given “limited liability,” due to the usurpation of Constitutional ‘lawful money.”
Government hath not the power to repeal The Bill of Rights, even at statute Civil Liberties. Government activity only creates the allusion of sovereignty by our birth in a corporate State hospital per certificate and unconditional contract.
A Citizen makes himself subject to the 14th Amendment public policy by waiving their individual rights on the very forms they fill out on any given day. These forms serve as an Affidavit in personam, because the negotiable units are signed under penalty of perjury. A representative statement vitiates ‘promise’ to appear in any capacity at the presumptive agency tribunal. Unless rebutted, these contracts serve as “certified’ fact on the Administrative Record before the tribunal at bar, with your ‘unconditional’ ‘in-personam’ (Fed. Rule 12. b) ‘writing.” Your choice was “taxation without representation’ for you did not avoid consequences of an ‘unconscionable, ‘unconditional” and now negotiable unit. Your tithes are in the synagogues of a de facto Master and our Lord is not pleased.
The Article I procedural due process “inferior court’, district attorney and your lawyer will only follow the procedures set forth by the record. Your representative should be on the record as ‘without prejudice’. If you do not rebut, the 14th Amendment of Article I ‘inferior’ court will try facts and subject matter only with a ‘fair and impartial jury’, rather than ‘peers’ trying ‘fact and law’ of Article III.The district attorney will not be sworn by ‘Thee People’ at Article II Executive to follow the ‘Public’ Law at The Department of Administrative Services (DAS) State Procurement Office (SPO) developed OAR 125-246 through 249, DAS Public Contracting Rules, for state agencies subject to DAS authority (Agencies).  The Model Rules do not apply to DAS or these Agencies. The A.G. will follow The State of Oregon at Federal ‘public policy’. Your attorney does not know “state” Citizen Rights, only federal ‘forum’ ‘persons’ procedure of the Tribunal per the Code of Military justice, which has been ‘adopted’ by most states. (Hence, the power of the Provost Marshals Office.)
Jurisdiction must be challenged at every issue to keep the controversy at the administrative level. The two required jurisdictions of ‘personam’ and ‘subject matter’ will not be served in the same court, unless it is Article III. A prayer or plea to equity must only reap equity. A commercial Tribunal must be dealt with commercially, the court must be bound to subject matter only and the Citizen must retain his ‘personam’. Your personam is ‘common Law’ at Bill of Rights, not equity, unless you failed to reserve your Rights.
The rule still stands, if you are challenged by equity, you must answer with equity. “Without prejudice” UCC1-308 is Remedy because the ‘representation’ in-personam reveals the ‘discovery’ that no Rights were thereby waived at Bill of Rights. UCC1-103.6 is equalizer via equity and notice, now the code must be read in harmony with the common Law at the Or. Code.  This section of the Uniform Commercial Code is the only place the Constitution and equity may be joined without ‘contempt’ of the tribunal.
A court which presumes you will appear, cannot issue a criminal warrant for ‘failure to appear’ at corporate bar. ‘Without prejudice’, written above your ‘writing’ at UCC 3.104.1, destroys its “unconditional” requirement at UCC 3-104.2 and ‘promise’ is forfeit at UCC 3-104.3. It serves as a bar to all others at ‘Obligation of Contract’ that a ‘condition’ is prima facie upon the unit and it is utterly void at Law.
It is ‘proclivity of your adversary not to answer’, so do not expect agency to give you any information on the above material. Stand your ground as intended when facing an adversary. Agency may play ‘ignorant’ and use ‘mail box policy’, answer everything. Force agency to write down their issues and mail them to you. Letters are the best facts and each failure to answer on the part of agency is further ‘estoppel.’ Phone calls are ‘parol’ and courts will offer you a ‘parol’ chance to explain yourself for ‘dishonoring’ agency presentment by ‘creditable’ agency phone call.
Excellent Generalship knowledge will come to bear upon those who proceed ‘in want of jurisdiction.’ You must know what to do or fail for the lack of so little effort at your Political Spirit. Luke 11:9 “entitles” We Thee People to Ask and then Seek Knowledge of which door to knock upon, for it does not open to uncertainty.
The word of Truth is binding only on those who have knowledge of it. Perhaps you have read too far? The Lamb is in the field, and the Choice of Him is yours. Each Citizen of us must “Ask’ why he fears and ‘Seek’ knowledge of which door to ‘Knock” and thereby abate worry. Greed for Power has coveted darkness to the faintest light of Sovereignty with God. Man must walk “Thee Way” or stumble over Thee Robe of The Fisherman and suffer the yoke of idolatry, and iniquity of Roman Lex. Truth of Church and Grace await compliance for false Teachers may not Covenant with Thee People, and The Robe is yet bartered to Civil Roman Lex.