Monday, October 29, 2018


Friday, October 26, 2018

"Right to Travel Act." States are seeing the real picture

10 LC 34 2350
House Bill 875

By: Representative Franklin of the 43rd

To amend Title 40 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to motor vehicles and traffic, so as to repeal Chapter 5, relating to drivers' licenses; provide for a short title; to report the findings of the General Assembly regarding the constitutionality of certain laws relating to drivers' licenses; to provide for an effective date; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Right to Travel Act."
The General Assembly finds that:

(1) Free people have a common law and constitutional right to travel on the roads and highways that are provided by their government for that purpose. Licensing of drivers cannot be required of free people because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of an inalienable right;

(2) In England in 1215, the right to travel was enshrined in Article 42 of Magna Carta:
It shall be lawful to any person, for the future, to go out of our kingdom, and to return, safely and securely, by land or by water, saving his allegiance to us, unless it be in time of war, for some short space, for the common good of the kingdom: excepting prisoners and outlaws, according to the laws of the land, and of the people of the nation at war against us, and Merchants who shall be treated as it is said above.

(3) Where rights secured by the Constitution of the United States and the State of Georgia are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate these rights. The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon an individual because of this exercise of constitutional rights;

(4) American citizens have the inalienable right to use the roads and highways unrestricted in any manner so long as they are not damaging or violating property or rights of others. The government, by requiring the people to obtain drivers' licenses, is restricting, and therefore violating, the people's common law and constitutional right to travel;

(5) In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), Justice Potter Stewart noted in a concurring opinion that the right to travel "is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all." The Articles of Confederation had an explicit right to travel; and we hold that the right to travel is so fundamental that the Framers thought it was unnecessary to include it in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights;

(6) The right to travel upon the public highways is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will but the common right which every citizen has under his or her right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his or her inclination along the public highways or in public places while conducting himself or herself in an orderly and decent manner; and

(7) Thus, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the citizens' right to travel upon the public roads by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive the right and convert that right into a privilege.
Title 40 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to motor vehicles and traffic, is amended by repealing Chapter 5, relating to drivers' licenses, and designating said chapter as reserved.
This Act shall become effective upon its approval by the Governor or upon its becoming law without such approval.
All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.

GA To Allow Right To Drive Without A License? 

Police officer Jack McLamb says you have a Constitutional right to travel without an internal passport driver license contract

Thursday, October 25, 2018



Today, almost all mothers, black or white, unknowingly inform on their own babies. Take a look at the so-called “Birth Certificate” CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH where the mother signs and you will see the title of the box stating in small print:
The word “OTHER” makes the mother “an informant.” By signing the “Birth Certificate” as an informer, she contracts with the government putting her child and her child’s future labor as collateral for the national debt (servitude–slavery). The father or mother can rescind the contract within three business days (Truth-in-Lending).
Since the Birth Certificate neither lists the father as the husband nor lists the wife’s acceptance of the father’s surname as her own but has the mothers maiden name instead, the baby is considered a BASTARD. Bastards are therefore under the care and control of the Priest Rule (democracy) and can be taken from the mother at any time.
The hospitals receive a fairly large monetary benefit ($3,000, more or less, per child) from the corporate government for having Birth Certificates filled out and signed.
Birth Certificate was created to offset U.S. Bankruptcy declared in 1933 to satisfy bankers and creditors of U.S. debt.
Legally, since your birth your artificial person, has been considered a slave or indentured servant to the various federal, provincial and municipal governments via your STATE-issued, STATE-created birth certificate in the name of your all-caps person. Your birth certificate was issued so that the issuer could claim “exclusive” title to the legal person created. This was further compounded when you voluntarily obtained a driver’s license and a SSN (Social Security Number).
The state even owns your personal and private life through your STATE-issued marriage license/certificate issued in the all-caps names. You have had no rights in birth, marriage, nor will you have them even in death unless you re-capture your straw man. (The names on tombstones in cemeteries are in all-caps.) The STATE holds the title to your legal person it created via your birth certificate, until Jane Mary Doe, the rightful owner, the holder n due course of the instrument, that is yourself, reclaims/redeems it.
Everything, since June 1933, operates in COMMERCE! Commerce is based on agreement, contract. Government has an implied agreement with the straw man (Strawman) (government’s creation) & the straw man (Strawman) is subject to government rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh & blood man & woman, step into their “process” we become the “surety” for the fictional straw man (Strawman). Reality & fiction are reversed. We then become liable for the debts, liabilities & obligations of the straw man (Strawman), relinquishing our real (protected) character as we stand up for the fictional straw man (Strawman).
The people are in the State and National government at that same time. The public government is an artificial entity. The government is owned and controlled by the same people. So the government is a sole organization, not an aggregate organization. As long as a man is dealing publicly, he is in a sole relationship with the public. The straw man, being artificial, lives in the artificial place called the public. At the same time as people are acting collectively in the larger body of people called the State and National government, they maintain their ability to act individually on a private basis.
The people did not give up the rights they did not delegate to the government – they retained those rights. Any man can contract privately as they see fit and government cannot interfere with the private contracts of men. The straw man lives in the public side of government. He is part of the public government, and functions under the laws of the public. This is necessary and proper because the creator of an entity has the right to control it.
Since the government created the straw man, it is only right that the straw man live under the rules of it’s creator. But once the straw man has been redeemed, the government is no longer in control of the straw man. He is now controlled by the man using his right to private contracts.
The 14th Amendment was not ratified. NEVER PASSED BY CONGRESS.
The 16th Amendment was not ratified by the states.
1st: In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today – what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.
2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.
3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment. The national constitution’s 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.
4th: The corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.
5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”. Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system-again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.
6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. It must be noted that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.
7th: Next (also 1913) Congress passed and entered the 17th amendment as ratified, even though the states had no opportunity to ratify the same. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected.
8th: In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for re-election in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only.
9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters WWI and passes their Emergency War Powers, and Trading with the Enemies Acts.
10th: In 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where in the new Corp. U.S., only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation. The only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers.
11th: In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.
12th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.
13th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. They create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and a depository account number in the Social Security General Trust Fund (GTF). They give you the Social Security card which identifies you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created (on review: you may notice that the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, the GTF is its beneficiary and you were made its Trustee.) More importantly: this capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your sovereign capacity in any way.
14th: In 1968, at the national governors’ conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people.
15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.
It is time that we all start to wake up and follow the truth, that is to repent and become a moral and honorable society. The biggest problem with the so called Patriot Movement is that its proponents are all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. even though they are blind to the truth, have no remedy, and bail out of “the system” hell bent for a rebellion that even the scripture says cannot be won. Would that we could instead unite with truth and legally, lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government to take back control our nation.

Thursday, October 18, 2018



With respect to the 50 Union States, one of the defining principles we inherited from our founders was this unique

Structure of a Dual Sovereignty between the Union States, and the federation of Union States (given the moniker of United States). The fundamental objective of this Dual sovereignty was to maintain the balance of specific delegated powers which We the People surrendered to each of them to achieve an orderly society in the face of individual sovereignty. The federation, like each Union State, was created via a Constitution depicting its limited powers with absolute declarations that those powers not relinquished to the new federation, named the United States, because these powers were reserved for the (Union) States and the people respectively.

However, the Union States have not kept up their end of the bargain to maintain the balance of power and have unconstitutionally permitted themselves to become Federal States, thus forfeiting their Union State Sovereign status, making them each subordinate to the entity they helped create, namely the United States. At the same time as a result of this Subordinating of the Union States, the concept of a Dual Sovereignty was also destroyed, eradicating the political

Architecture our founders so painstakingly structured as a balancing mechanism for the various delegated Constitutional powers between the Federal Government and each of the Union States.

As for treatment, in our Republic the agencies of government have no access to individuals except those who have Contracted with said agency or who has been the subject of a complaint from another individual initiating a cause of action in the courts for some controversy or common law crime, trespass, fraud, murder, etc. However, whenever a cause of action is properly established, equal and just treatment is required and demanded by the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Amendments to the Constitution.

This brings about two doctrines which cover the total gambit of all human behavior. The Doctrine of Non-Existing Rights states that “no one has the right to interfere with or influence the life of another without his consent.” The corollary, The Doctrine of Rights states that “everyone has a right to do or act or conduct his affairs in any manner he chose so long as he does not interfere with the life of another without the other's consent." Together, these stated doctrines represent the “Doctrines of liberty.”

The first, and probably the most damaging blow to our Republic in the long term, was the passing of the Federal Reserve Act creating the privately owned Federal Reserve central banking system. One of the members of the Rothschild’s international banking family candidly stated around the turn of the 19th century that "if I can control a 12 It is interesting to note that one of our modern religions has its roots in mob rule, ala Pontius Pilate. Remember? Our founders did. 18 country's banking system, I care not who makes its laws." This may have been the real reason for the creation of the central banking system, the privately owned Federal Reserve System, but it was sold to the people as a "monetary stabilization" mechanism. 

However, aside from the fact that "monetary stabilization of fiat money" is an oxymoron, the newly created Federal Reserve System was anything but a mechanism associated in any way with "monetary stabilization." In sixteen (16) short years later, 1929, it brought the United States free market to its knees by first dolling out cheap un-backed paper debt, (we were on a gold standard at the time) and then abruptly recalling the debt, the interest of which had to be paid in gold to this newly created central bank, causing a collapse of the market wiping out most of our family fortunes and savings.

The second 1913 debacle was the ratification of the 16thAmendment, the "Income Tax" Amendment. However, in 1916 the Supreme Court ruled that the 16th Amendment created no new form of taxation. It said that the federal income tax was merely an indirect excise (or privilege) tax where taxable income (net profit) was the measure of the benefit from the exercise of the privilege and therefore the measure of the tax.13 Notice the concept of a privilege tax14. Rights are still not taxable, but scarcely anyone today understands this distinction.

Third, and probably the cornerstone of advancing the concepts of a Democracy, was the passing of the 17th Amendment changing how Senators were seated in Congress. The original Constitution specified that Senators as representatives of the interests of the individual states would consequently be appointed by the state legislatures. The 17thAmendment, while it didn't substantively change anything else, it provided that the Senators would be elected by the popular vote of the people. 

The Senate was designed by the architects of the Constitution to give the sovereign Union states equal representation in federal legislature alongside the sovereign people. Each, the Union states and the people, were sovereigns with respect to the federal legislature in the eyes of the Framers of the Constitution. While nothing in the 17th Amendment actually changed the responsibility of the Senators to represent their Union state as an entity represented in the Senate, the Senators themselves, now look to the people to maintain the ir appointed jobs and therefore have loyalty to none but the majority of the people. 

Consequently, the Union states themselves now have no voice in the federal government making the 17th Amendment the key spring board or the first shoe to drop in the effort to the establishment of a Democracy. It is a simple fact that a sovereign with no voice is not recognized and is therefore, by definition, not a sovereign.

While the obedience leg of the Power Trinity wasn't established overnight. The first “notch in the handle” occurred in 1933 when Congress declared that it was “against public policy for the people of the United States to own gold,” and the people obediently turned in their gold in exchange for paper. 

It is a little known fact among the citizens of this country that the Constitution gives the federal government, Congress, “exclusive legislative jurisdiction" only over Washington, D.C. and other federally owned lands where such jurisdiction has been transferred to it from the Union state in which the land was originally situated (See Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2). 

However, Congress has no delegated power to govern the people of or in any one of the various Union states that are party to the Constitution. When the people of the states obediently turned in their gold in exchange for private paper notes they sent a huge message of ignorant obedience to Washington, D.C. While we all know that ignorance of the law is no excuse; one must be ever mindful of the fact that it is actually preferred in matters of obedient performance. But even worse, where did the people go to turn in their gold for paper? Why they went to the private central Federal Reserve Bank, of course. NOW, who owns the gold?

Two years later: Congress passed the Federal Insurance Contribution Act, a.k.a. the Social Security Act. This "non -accidental" legislation was arguably the most nefarious and fraudulent assault on the sovereignty of the people and therefore the foundation of our Constitutional Republic. The people thought they were (or are) participating in a "federal old age insurance plan" but a simple reading of the statutes reveals the fact that it is nothing less than a deviously levied income tax measured by the wages of federal employees. (See Section 3101 of the Internal Revenue one contributes to Social Security, he not only pays an income tax measured by his wages, he makes a declaration that his wages are taxable income and therefore establishes prima facie that he is a federal taxpayer subject to all the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code including the other income taxes. Getting the people to participate in this camouflaged taxing scheme was another "notch in the handle" of the obedience leg of the Power Trinity.

Keep in mind that the Constitution forbids the federal government from taxing the people directly. But since the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax was a benefit tax and Social Security is a “benefit,” the payment of the Social Security deduction was presumed to be a voluntary participation in a federal benefit program for which a

Benefit tax (income tax) could be levied in exchange for the benefit. It only took us fifty (50) years to figure this out and most people, including many tax researchers, to this day fail to recognize this devious tax scheme.

The obedience leg of the Power Trinity. Keep in mind that the Constitution forbids the federal government from taxing the people directly. But since the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax was a benefit tax and Social Security is a “benefit,” the payment of the Social Security deduction was presumed to be a voluntary participation in a federal benefit program for which a benefit tax (income tax) could be levied in exchange for the benefit. It only took us fifty (50) years to figure this out and most people, including many tax researchers, to this day fail to recognize this devious tax scheme. In 1939 Congress passed the "non-accidental" legislation called the “Public Salary Tax Act" taxing its employees for the privilege of working for the federal government, but few people cared.

One, not that many people worked for the federal government in 1939 and two, those that did didn't mind the one or two percent tax on their salaries; after all they had many benefits working for the federal government worth more than this new tax, like full retirement, paid vacations, etc. The full impact of this "non-accidental" legislation would not be felt for another 15-20 years. Then the tax rate would be much higher, nearly 20 percent, and the number of federal government employees would be a significant percentage of the total labor force. Now what do we have? We now have a huge jealous federal bureaucracy assisting in the collection of an income tax mistakenly publicized to be imposed on the general population with the attitude that "if I have to pay, you have to pay," To help soften the general population to the acceptance of a general income tax, Congress in 1943 passed the "non accidental" Victory Tax Act capitalizing on the people’s patriotism to help finance the Second World War." It was to be a temporary "voluntary tax" which was to be refunded at the cessation of hostilities. But what it really accomplished was to get the general population accustomed to filing 1040 forms for those obedient enough to volunteer. However, one had to apply for the refund to realize the "promise" of the Act. At the cessation of

Hostilities everyone was so preoccupied with trying to put their lives and their families back together that no one remembered (and the federal government didn't remind them) to apply for their Victory Tax Act refund. Instead: the federal government simply proceeded as if the Victory Tax Act was still in force and the general population obediently continued to file form 1040's as if the income tax was here to stay. Aided by the "hype" of the Cold War, the Korean "police action", and the propaganda mechanisms of the press and the big business establishment (i. e. international corporations and international banking establishments) the final "notch in the handle" of obedience was now established.

This final concession of obedience where the individual citizens were obediently filing annual 1040 forms also carries with it the final leg of the Power Trinity - monitoring. Coupled with the mountain of morality legislation' (i.e. gun laws, drug laws, etc.) and the enforcement thereof together with another mountain of specific performance legislation (i.e. the required use of a Social Security number for a driver’s license, etc., the inferred requirement to file tax returns, etc.) to monitor the general population individually, the people have lost all semblance of sovereignty. They have become dependent, obedient, and monitored serfs on the land under full control of a self-appointed aristocracy. Sovereigns to serfs in forty (40) short years! We the People became Sovereigns in a Republic to serfs (subjects) in a Democracy. While the people have equal rights as provided by statute, they do not have unalienable rights as provide by Nature and Nature's God: while they have equal opportunity as provided by statute, they do not have unlimited opportunity limited only by their own personal capabilities and desires as declared by the Declaration of Independence; and while they get equal treatment as provided by statute, they are not treated as sovereigns who are,

By, definition, permitted to go about their daily business as they see fit. As subjects under a Democracy the people are obligated to specific performance as defined by statute, as sovereigns under a Republic there is no concept of specific performance by statute, only such performance as mutually agreed to by contract with fellow sovereigns. The road from a Republic to a Democracy can be symbolized by the allegory of a Frog. If you put a frog in a pan of very hot water he will jump out. However, if you put a frog in a pan of cool water and gradually apply heat to it, he will not only not jump out, he will sit there in the pan as the water is gradually heated to boiling, thereby tolerating being thoroughly "cooked to perfection." the journey was a slow stroll spanning multiple generations and the people never became aware of the gradual erosion of their sovereign status. 

They became dependent, obedient, and monitored subject class citizens thoroughly "controlled to perfection." And finally, reread above on page 11 what our founders had to say about “democracies:” The Constitution says that “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same Act, or on Confession in open Court.” Any attempt to covertly alter a nations political structure is an Act of War because it is an attempt to replace the power structure in office prior to the attempt and thus occupy the nation with an

Alien or foreign power, thus, any attempt to alter the political structure of this Constitutional Republic to that of a Democracy is attempting to replace the Sovereign Citizens and the Sovereign Union States with Peon Serfs for the purpose of Occupation. Occupation is an Act of War, Consequently, any person who openly declares the this Constitutional Republic is a Democracy is openly admitting that they are aiding and abetting an Alien construct to destroy the very essence of this Country which was created to protect and preserve the Liberty of the sovereign Citizens.

To say this Country is a Democracy is an attempt at Alien occupation. Since occupation is an Act of War any such reference to this Country as a Democracy is an Act of Treason, particularly if it is made by an elected official or a person running for public office. It should be easy enough to find two Witnesses.

There exists in many of the Union States a desire by some of its legislators to rid their Union State of the shackles of much of the recent federal legislation and, in effect, return their Union State to its rightful Constitutional Sovereign Statehood status. upon ratification of the Constitution, did not consent to become mere appendages of the Federal Government. Rather, they entered the Union "with their sovereignty intact." Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak,

501 U. S. 775, 779 (1991). [Emphasis added] An integral component of that "residuary and inviolable sovereignty," The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (J. Madison), retained by the States is their immunity from private suits. Reflecting the widespread understanding at the time the Constitution was drafted, Alexander Hamilton explained:

States, in ratifying the Constitution, did surrender a portion of their inherent immunity by consenting to suits brought by sister States or by the Federal Government. See Alden v. Maine, 527 U. S. 706, 755 (1999). Nevertheless, the Convention did not disturb States' immunity from private suits, thus firmly enshrining this principle in our constitutional

"The leading advocates of the Constitution assured the people in no uncertain terms that the Constitution would not strip the States of sovereign immunity." Id., at 716. (Emphasis added). 

Now you have the true information. What are you going to do with it, is the question?

Saturday, September 29, 2018


Friday, September 28, 2018

What does a Nuclear Bomb feel like?

Thursday, September 27, 2018