The Fallacy of the Treaty of Paris 1783:
(The contract which sells out America into CROWN Corporate control of USA inc.)
(The contract which sells out America into CROWN Corporate control of USA inc.)
The American Republic actually LOST the revolutionary war, and the sovereign people of America have been manipulated into the belief that they won, in order for the CROWN to gain control & subserviency to their crown corporation inc. / king of england.
In order to complete the deception to make the people of America think they had won, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION "gained" the land rights of the Republic from the CROWN CORPORATION but agreed to let the KING of England TAX the people.
**** (If America the sovereign people of the republic won the war, (not the US CORPORATION) we never would have agreed to roll over and allow to be taxed by the KING OF ENGLAND as it clearly says the losing Americans agree TO Do in the Treaty of 1783. That would be the equivalent of the USA corporation agreeing to let Japan or Germany tax them after their surrender. Read it below for yourself in the treaty of 1783) .................................
In order to complete the deception to make the people of America think they had won, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION "gained" the land rights of the Republic from the CROWN CORPORATION but agreed to let the KING of England TAX the people.
**** (If America the sovereign people of the republic won the war, (not the US CORPORATION) we never would have agreed to roll over and allow to be taxed by the KING OF ENGLAND as it clearly says the losing Americans agree TO Do in the Treaty of 1783. That would be the equivalent of the USA corporation agreeing to let Japan or Germany tax them after their surrender. Read it below for yourself in the treaty of 1783) .................................
In the Treaty of 1783,
("the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States"),
United States Corporate Employees, Ambassadors & Freemasons Ben Franklin, John Adams and John Jay Acknowledge Britain's King George as the "Prince, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the United States".
("the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States"),
United States Corporate Employees, Ambassadors & Freemasons Ben Franklin, John Adams and John Jay Acknowledge Britain's King George as the "Prince, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the United States".
.. Although it may seem in the treaty that King George / Prince George of the U.S./ THE CROWN CORPORATION relinquishes it's land rights to the U.S., they knowingly do not, however, relinquish the right to extract capital from the "Citizens of the United States".
Simply Click the link o the treaty of 1783 below and read:
- http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
- http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
-------------------
*A "U.S. citizen" IS CONSIDERED A RESIDENT ALIEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WITH NO COMMON LAW RIGHT TO TRAVEL - (operating commercially)
*A "U.S. citizen" IS CONSIDERED A RESIDENT ALIEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WITH NO COMMON LAW RIGHT TO TRAVEL - (operating commercially)
20. "...For while a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways...as a place for PRIVATE GAIN (I.E. operating commercially). For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of this state, but it is a privilege...which the (state) may grant or withhold at its discretion..." State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073
21. "The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.'' - CAHA v. U.S. , 152 U.S. 211 (1894)
..."Generally speaking, within any state of this Union the preservation of the peace and the protection of person and property are the functions of the state government, and are no part of the primary duty, at least, of the nation. The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government."
I’m sorry folks. I hate to be the one to burst all those patriot bubbles out there but the U.S. will never regain one ounce of its former glory. It will be remembered as the nation that had it all - and lost it….fast.
I’m sorry folks. I hate to be the one to burst all those patriot bubbles out there but the U.S. will never regain one ounce of its former glory. It will be remembered as the nation that had it all - and lost it….fast.
Gone are the days when you can check your guns in with your luggage and board a plane wearing a four inch lock-blade on your belt passing through security without fear of being searched. Now you watch helplessly as TSA photographs you in the nude and molests every inch of your children right in front of you.
You live in a nation where habeas corpus has been abolished. This means you don’t have any rights at all. You may not face your accuser; know what it is you are charged with, can be held in prison indefinitely without charges ever being filed; all without recourse.
For citizens, you only lost the bragging rights that came from being on the winning team. You never OWNED the team. You never held any right, title or interest in the nation itself, in fact you were owned by it – literally. They were able to do it to you because they led you to believe that you were free when in reality you were a slave the whole time. One is more productive that way.
When one takes the time to research the matter it’s discovered that U.S. citizens had the deck stacked against them every step of the way and that there was a plan in place the whole time for things to transpire exactly as they have these past decades.
They taught you false history, fed you lies when you watched the “news”, got you to believe absurdities so that they can get you to commit atrocities, and you did. Yes, they got you to commit genocide and even torture to your fellow man then make excuses to justify it – all lies, mind you.
You’re reading this only because you’ve begun to awaken. Awakening is an ongoing process because they’ve put you DEEP into a hypnotic trance. So deep is this trance that you never even realized you were in one; perhaps not even as yet.
For those of you deep enough in that trance that you’re still chanting U.S.A.!! U.S.A.!!! Just remember that the united States of America (correctly spelled) has not existed as a nation since September 17, 1787.
The 56 men who signed the declaration of independence (one fled to the Caribbean when war broke out) lost all right, title and interest to the 39 men who signed the U.S. Constitution. It even says so right in the Preamble to the Constitution: “We the People of the United States… - …do ordain and establish this Constitution for the united States of America.” Now who’s in the superior position here?... The United States or the united States of America on whose behalf they executed the agreement?
Additionally, citizens were never a party to the U.S. Constitution EVER. Read the Preamble in its entirety and see for yourself:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the united States of America.”
“…and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…”
Now why did they say it that way? I’m thinking it’s because they did it for themselves and THEIR Posterity and not citizens just the way it reads. Remember, it’s a contract. Punctuation and capitalization is an altering factor in the wording of contracts. Additionally omission from mention is also omission from inclusion.
There have been a good many court decisions which specifically articulate that citizens who were not descended from the 39 men are NOT subjects to the U.S. Constitution. Many of them are mired in legalized mumbo-jumbo but one stands out as a testament to clarity and specificity. The whole decision is some eighty pages long but one sentence jumps right off the page:
“"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a contract , he is not a party to it." ~ Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 1854 WL 1492 (Ga., Jan Term 1854) (NO. 64)
Yes, the constitution is a contract. Anyone not named on that contract is not a party to it. The 39 signers are and who else? ~ THEIR Posterity.
And here all the while you thought voting helped.
And here all the while you thought voting helped.
You thought you had rights when all along they were granted privileges long since un-granted.
Do you LIKE being a slave? Do you ACCEPT the condition of having no rights? If you answered no to either of those questions you should consider becoming more familiar with the process that the 56 signors of the declaration of independence put themselves through (although they blew it when they committed acts of war in their declaration’s last paragraph). It’s not at all complicated.
All nations are societies and the 56 men formed such a society who declared themselves a nation. They WERE a nation from that point until their debts overwhelmed them five years later. Had they taken better care in learning international law and The Law of Nations they would have remained in honor instead of stealing the lands of their former sovereign and usurping 2.5 million British subjects without their consent.
Let’s move on to what the signors of the declaration of independence did looking at it more closely. The concept of “the consent of the governed” was just mentioned. This is a necessary aspect of governance if one is to remain a governor over others. It is in fact a critical component.
Self-determination is a process of freeing yourself from a governing authority you cannot agree with in good conscience. There are countless examples all throughout history, some of which you have already read in bible study class.
Definition of self-determination: Self-determination (international law) “Self-determination denotes the legal right of people to decide their own destiny in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law, arising from customary international law, but also recognized as a general principle of law, and enshrined in a number of international treaties. For instance, self-determination is protected in the United Nations Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as a right of “all peoples.”
The scope and purpose of the principle of self-determination has evolved significantly in the 20th century. In the early 1900’s, international support grew for the right of all people to self-determination. This led to successful secessionist movements during and after WWI, WWII and laid the groundwork for decolonization in the 1960s.
Contemporary notions of self-determination usually distinguish between “internal” and “external” self-determination, suggesting that "self-determination" exists on a spectrum. Internal self-determination may refer to various political and social rights; by contrast, external self-determination refers to full legal independence/secession for the given 'people' from the larger politico-legal state.” ~ Cornell University Law School Wex Dictionary
Let’s also take a look at an the U.N. Charter. CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES Article 1 Section 2) “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace”
Now let’s look at The United Nations INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS PART 1 Article 1 Clause 1 “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
So if you were to exercise the right of self-determination you would need to form a society of like-minded people, learn international law and The Law of Nations then declare your independence and perfect your nation. That doesn’t sound that hard, does it? Then why do want to continue living as a slave?
The Red Pill added 2 new photos.
The Fallacy of the Treaty of Paris 1783:
(The contract which sells out America into CROWN Corporate control of USA inc.)
(The contract which sells out America into CROWN Corporate control of USA inc.)
The American Republic actually LOST the revolutionary war, and the sovereign people of America have been manipulated into the belief that they won, in order for the CROWN to gain control & subserviency to their crown corporation inc. / king of england.
In order to complete the deception to make the people of America think they had won, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION "gained" the land rights of the Republic from the CROWN CORPORATION but agreed to let the KING of England TAX the people.
**** (If America the sovereign people of the republic won the war, (not the US CORPORATION) we never would have agreed to roll over and allow to be taxed by the KING OF ENGLAND as it clearly says the losing Americans agree TO Do in the Treaty of 1783. That would be the equivalent of the USA corporation agreeing to let Japan or Germany tax them after their surrender. Read it below for yourself in the treaty of 1783) .................................
In order to complete the deception to make the people of America think they had won, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION "gained" the land rights of the Republic from the CROWN CORPORATION but agreed to let the KING of England TAX the people.
**** (If America the sovereign people of the republic won the war, (not the US CORPORATION) we never would have agreed to roll over and allow to be taxed by the KING OF ENGLAND as it clearly says the losing Americans agree TO Do in the Treaty of 1783. That would be the equivalent of the USA corporation agreeing to let Japan or Germany tax them after their surrender. Read it below for yourself in the treaty of 1783) .................................
In the Treaty of 1783,
("the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States"),
United States Corporate Employees, Ambassadors & Freemasons Ben Franklin, John Adams and John Jay Acknowledge Britain's King George as the "Prince, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the United States".
("the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States"),
United States Corporate Employees, Ambassadors & Freemasons Ben Franklin, John Adams and John Jay Acknowledge Britain's King George as the "Prince, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the United States".
.. Although it may seem in the treaty that King George / Prince George of the U.S./ THE CROWN CORPORATION relinquishes it's land rights to the U.S., they knowingly do not, however, relinquish the right to extract capital from the "Citizens of the United States".
Simply Click the link o the treaty of 1783 below and read:
- http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
- http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
-------------------
*A "U.S. citizen" IS CONSIDERED A RESIDENT ALIEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WITH NO COMMON LAW RIGHT TO TRAVEL - (operating commercially)
*A "U.S. citizen" IS CONSIDERED A RESIDENT ALIEN OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WITH NO COMMON LAW RIGHT TO TRAVEL - (operating commercially)
20. "...For while a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways...as a place for PRIVATE GAIN (I.E. operating commercially). For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of this state, but it is a privilege...which the (state) may grant or withhold at its discretion..." State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073
21. "The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.'' - CAHA v. U.S. , 152 U.S. 211 (1894)
..."Generally speaking, within any state of this Union the preservation of the peace and the protection of person and property are the functions of the state government, and are no part of the primary duty, at least, of the nation. The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government."
I’m sorry folks. I hate to be the one to burst all those patriot bubbles out there but the U.S. will never regain one ounce of its former glory. It will be remembered as the nation that had it all - and lost it….fast.
I’m sorry folks. I hate to be the one to burst all those patriot bubbles out there but the U.S. will never regain one ounce of its former glory. It will be remembered as the nation that had it all - and lost it….fast.
Gone are the days when you can check your guns in with your luggage and board a plane wearing a four inch lock-blade on your belt passing through security without fear of being searched. Now you watch helplessly as TSA photographs you in the nude and molests every inch of your children right in front of you.
You live in a nation where habeas corpus has been abolished. This means you don’t have any rights at all. You may not face your accuser; know what it is you are charged with, can be held in prison indefinitely without charges ever being filed; all without recourse.
For citizens, you only lost the bragging rights that came from being on the winning team. You never OWNED the team. You never held any right, title or interest in the nation itself, in fact you were owned by it – literally. They were able to do it to you because they led you to believe that you were free when in reality you were a slave the whole time. One is more productive that way.
When one takes the time to research the matter it’s discovered that U.S. citizens had the deck stacked against them every step of the way and that there was a plan in place the whole time for things to transpire exactly as they have these past decades.
They taught you false history, fed you lies when you watched the “news”, got you to believe absurdities so that they can get you to commit atrocities, and you did. Yes, they got you to commit genocide and even torture to your fellow man then make excuses to justify it – all lies, mind you.
You’re reading this only because you’ve begun to awaken. Awakening is an ongoing process because they’ve put you DEEP into a hypnotic trance. So deep is this trance that you never even realized you were in one; perhaps not even as yet.
For those of you deep enough in that trance that you’re still chanting U.S.A.!! U.S.A.!!! Just remember that the united States of America (correctly spelled) has not existed as a nation since September 17, 1787.
The 56 men who signed the declaration of independence (one fled to the Caribbean when war broke out) lost all right, title and interest to the 39 men who signed the U.S. Constitution. It even says so right in the Preamble to the Constitution: “We the People of the United States… - …do ordain and establish this Constitution for the united States of America.” Now who’s in the superior position here?... The United States or the united States of America on whose behalf they executed the agreement?
Additionally, citizens were never a party to the U.S. Constitution EVER. Read the Preamble in its entirety and see for yourself:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the united States of America.”
“…and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…”
Now why did they say it that way? I’m thinking it’s because they did it for themselves and THEIR Posterity and not citizens just the way it reads. Remember, it’s a contract. Punctuation and capitalization is an altering factor in the wording of contracts. Additionally omission from mention is also omission from inclusion.
There have been a good many court decisions which specifically articulate that citizens who were not descended from the 39 men are NOT subjects to the U.S. Constitution. Many of them are mired in legalized mumbo-jumbo but one stands out as a testament to clarity and specificity. The whole decision is some eighty pages long but one sentence jumps right off the page:
“"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a contract , he is not a party to it." ~ Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 1854 WL 1492 (Ga., Jan Term 1854) (NO. 64)
Yes, the constitution is a contract. Anyone not named on that contract is not a party to it. The 39 signers are and who else? ~ THEIR Posterity.
And here all the while you thought voting helped.
And here all the while you thought voting helped.
You thought you had rights when all along they were granted privileges long since un-granted.
Do you LIKE being a slave? Do you ACCEPT the condition of having no rights? If you answered no to either of those questions you should consider becoming more familiar with the process that the 56 signors of the declaration of independence put themselves through (although they blew it when they committed acts of war in their declaration’s last paragraph). It’s not at all complicated.
All nations are societies and the 56 men formed such a society who declared themselves a nation. They WERE a nation from that point until their debts overwhelmed them five years later. Had they taken better care in learning international law and The Law of Nations they would have remained in honor instead of stealing the lands of their former sovereign and usurping 2.5 million British subjects without their consent.
Let’s move on to what the signors of the declaration of independence did looking at it more closely. The concept of “the consent of the governed” was just mentioned. This is a necessary aspect of governance if one is to remain a governor over others. It is in fact a critical component.
Self-determination is a process of freeing yourself from a governing authority you cannot agree with in good conscience. There are countless examples all throughout history, some of which you have already read in bible study class.
Definition of self-determination: Self-determination (international law) “Self-determination denotes the legal right of people to decide their own destiny in the international order. Self-determination is a core principle of international law, arising from customary international law, but also recognized as a general principle of law, and enshrined in a number of international treaties. For instance, self-determination is protected in the United Nations Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as a right of “all peoples.”
The scope and purpose of the principle of self-determination has evolved significantly in the 20th century. In the early 1900’s, international support grew for the right of all people to self-determination. This led to successful secessionist movements during and after WWI, WWII and laid the groundwork for decolonization in the 1960s.
Contemporary notions of self-determination usually distinguish between “internal” and “external” self-determination, suggesting that "self-determination" exists on a spectrum. Internal self-determination may refer to various political and social rights; by contrast, external self-determination refers to full legal independence/secession for the given 'people' from the larger politico-legal state.” ~ Cornell University Law School Wex Dictionary
Let’s also take a look at an the U.N. Charter. CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES Article 1 Section 2) “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace”
Now let’s look at The United Nations INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS PART 1 Article 1 Clause 1 “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
So if you were to exercise the right of self-determination you would need to form a society of like-minded people, learn international law and The Law of Nations then declare your independence and perfect your nation. That doesn’t sound that hard, does it? Then why do want to continue living as a slave?
No comments:
Post a Comment