September 19, 2011
Americans Say Federal Gov't Wastes
Over Half of Every Dollar
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ --
Americans estimate that the federal government wastes 51 cents of every dollar
it spends, a new high in a Gallup trend question first asked in 1979.
The current estimate of 51 cents wasted on the dollar is
similar to what Gallup measured in 2009, but marks the first time Americans
believe more than half of federal spending is wasted. The low point in the
trend is 38 cents wasted on the dollar, in 1986.
Americans are less likely to believe state and local
government’s waste money they spend than they are to believe this about the
federal government, with the state estimate at 42 cents on the dollar and the
local at 38 cents.
Americans have viewed the federal government as being the
most wasteful of tax dollars -- and local government the least -- each time
Gallup has asked these questions. That pattern is consistent with Americans'
greater trust in state and local government than in the federal government.
Over time, though, Americans have become increasingly likely
to see all levels of government as being wasteful of tax dollars. Americans now
believe all levels of government waste at least 11 cents more on the dollar
compared with 1979.
Conservatives among
Most Likely to See Federal Government Waste
Estimates of federal government waste do not vary greatly by
political partisanship, with only a 5 cent difference between Republicans' and
Democrats' averages, but show more differentiation by ideology. Conservatives
are much more likely than liberals to view the federal government as wasting
money.
Senior citizens' estimate of wasted federal dollars ranks
with conservatives' as one of the highest, and is significantly greater than
that of Americans aged 18 to 29.
Additionally, those with more formal education estimate
proportionately less federal government waste than do Americans with less
education.
The ideological differences observed this year were not
apparent in 2001, when Republican George W. Bush was president. At that time,
liberals estimated a larger share of federal spending was wasted than
conservatives did, 48 cents to 44. Thus, one's perceptions of how much federal
spending is wasted depend partly on the match between a person's ideological
preferences and the prevailing power structure in Washington.
There are generally smaller political differences in
perceptions of wasteful state and local spending vs. federal spending, though
conservatives' estimate of how much money local government wastes is
significantly higher than liberals'.
The sharp differences between young and old in terms of
federal government spending are not apparent in their estimates of how much
money state and local governments waste. But the differences by education are
consistent, as those with postgraduate education are much less likely than
those with no college education to see state and local governments as wasting
money.
Implications
Over the last 30 years, Americans have become increasingly
likely to see all levels of government as wasting the money they spend, and now
the public believes the federal government wastes more than half of the money
it spends. It is not clear whether Americans believe government wastes money
because it spends on programs they believe are not needed, or because it does
not spend money efficiently on programs, whether needed or not. Also, it is not
clear whether Americans believe money is wasted more on discretionary
government spending, or more on defense, entitlement programs, and interest on
the debt -- which make up the bulk of federal government spending.
In any case, the federal government has made efforts to rein
in spending this year, as part of the 2011 budget and the deal to raise the
debt ceiling limit. As part of that deal, a supercommittee of 12 members of
Congress is now seeking additional areas for cuts, to avoid automatic cuts in
defense and entitlement programs. State and local governments have also been
forced to make cuts in order to balance budgets as revenues have come in lower
as a result of the state of the economy. Still, with all of these efforts to
curb spending, the average American does not appear to give government at all
levels much credit for being careful in spending tax dollars.
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone
interviews conducted Sept. 8-11, 2011, with a random sample of 1,017 adults,
aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults,
one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4
percentage points.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline
telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for
respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample includes a minimum
quota of 400 cell phone respondents and 600 landline respondents per 1,000
national adults, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents by
region. Landline telephone numbers are chosen at random among listed telephone
numbers. Cell phone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline
respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which
member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, Hispanic
ethnicity, education, region, adults in the household, and phone status (cell
phone only/landline only/both, cell phone mostly, and having an unlisted
landline number). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2010
Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older
non-institutionalized population living in U.S. telephone households. All
reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for
weighting and sample design.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and
practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into
the findings of public opinion polls.
View methodology, full question results, and trend data.
For more details on
Gallup's polling methodology, visit www.gallup.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment