Search This Blog

Saturday, February 1, 2014

In Memory of Space Shuttle Challenger Whistleblower Edward Laughrin (murdered)

Space_Shuttle_ChallengerSpace_Shuttle_Challenger_1_.JPG
IN MEMORY OF LIFES LOST IN SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER
JANUARY 28, 2014

Federal Whistleblower,  Edward Laughrin rest in peace.

January 28, 1986 the Space Shuttle Challenger was reported to have exploded in midair. This was the U.S. Governments official report in mid 2011. The U.S. government official report lists all crew members had died during the explosion.

Now let me tell you why I have always thought this to be untrue. I think and know they all made it thru the explosion as the space shuttle separated from the fuel tanks. The space shuttle and crew cabin were designed to with stand "Plasma". For those of you who don't know what plasma is, It's electrically neutral, highly ionized gas composed of ions, electrons, and neutral particles. It is a phase of matter distinct from solids, liquids, and normal gases".  I worked for one of the hundred contractors who pre pair and build the parts for NASA. I plated all the wing flaps and gear shifts for the space shuttles. Having to know the space shuttle inside and out, that crew cabin survived the little explosion with out a doubt. Here's a peek of the diagram of the shuttle for you.

Space Shuttle

                              Why do you care about plasma?
                 What does it have to do with the space shuttle?

Plasma is called the fourth state of matter. Plasma, the state of matter in a fusion reaction, is thought to be the next great method for generating energy.  "Fusion can only occur in super-heated environments measuring in the millions of degrees." Stars, which are made of plasma, are the only natural objects that are hot enough to create fusion reactions. The high level of heat required to create this type of plasma makes it impossible to contain the components in any known material.

The rate of energy transfer (P) through substance is shown in the equation below.
P = kA(T2-T1)/L
The space shuttle is moving so fast during re-entry, over 30,000km/h, that a plasma is formed on the bottom of the shuttle. Contrary to intuition the extreme heat that causes the plasma does not come from the friction of the air molecules, but from the extreme pressure that is built up in front of the shuttle. The temperatures become so extreme that they facilitate in creating a plasma in front of the shuttle as it is "falling" through the atmosphere. If the plasma ever found a way in the space shuttle thru a little crack, the millions of degree heat would simple melt the shuttle as it's working its way thru.
Now for that space shuttle can last thru Plasma, I think it clearly could survive that little explosion since the fuel tanks were 95% empty when exploded. Because they were given the all go ahead with "GO WITH THROTTLE UP" meaning fuel tanks are done with there job. OOOHHHHH YAAA, one other reason I forgot to tell you why I think they all survived.

Meet Federal Whistleblower:  Edward Laughrin

Ed did the interview below with Kerry Cassidy, about the Space Shuttle Challenger and how his Naval Ship pulled up to the Challenger floating and beginning to sink and he saw someone alive waving from the cockpit of the Challenger his crewman began the rescues with hooks and cable to keep the Challenger from sinking when they Ships Commander got a call to abort and chase off a nearby Russian Vessel they questioned the orders from higher ups and then followed the orders while crew members saw the Space Shuttle Challenger sink.
http://youtu.be/-xa1zduo4cg 

Edward was onboard the first Navy vessel to encounter the downed capsule when it hit the water after the crash. He was pre pairing cable lines ready to hook the capsule when he saw one of the astronauts crew members waving at him. What he reveals here is clear evidence of supreme negligence on the part of NASA which leads to the possible conclusion that there was malice and intent in this lack of action to save our astronauts.
This testimony brings into sharp relief evidence of a organization working toward a particular agenda that does not safeguard the well being of Americans and specifically our astronauts under circumstances whereby the agenda they are working with takes precendence. This is unconscionable.

Prior evidence of the hidden mission behind NASA is well documented by Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara in their groundbreaking book “Dark Mission”. Highly recommended.
Given the rough quality of this impromptu testimony with regard to the Challenger disaster evidence of negligence obviously requires a great deal more investigation. I encourage researchers to take this testimony and investigate further. There must be others out there who were on board the Navy vessel and witnessed the events causing their ship to be turned away from attempting to rescue the astronauts at that critical juncture.




No comments: