TEMPLATES FOR *(AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH)* RIGHT OF TRAVEL

I LEFT OUT THE LAST STEP YOU NEED TO COMPLETE THE PURPOSE. I SPENT 4 MONTHS AND MONEY GETTING FORMS AND DOCUMENTS, 1,000 HOURS RESEARCHING EVERY LEGAL STEP TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS. THE LAST ITEM YOU NEED TO COMPLETE YOU HAVE TO RESEARCH IT YOURSELF. 

This Affidavit of Truth, I hand over to law enforcement. I have no license or plates on my vehicles. *****WARNING****** DO NOT just copy this and use it. You will go to jail. There is a lot more to this. Do your own 

research before attempting to use this form. Edit to your specific case. 

IN ORDER FOR YOU TO DUE THIS LEGALLY, YOU NEED TO REVOKE THE STATES TRUSTEESHIP BYE CONEYANCE, SEND NOTICE TO ALL COUNTY , STATE, DMV AGENTS , EXPORTING VEHICLE TO NEW JURISDICTION OR FREE REPUBLIC,   

This is by no means legal advice, or contract.

NOTICE AND WARNING TO ALL CALIFORNIA LAW AGENCY’S OFFICER’S WITH THE STATE, COUNTY, CITY, SHERIFF’S, POLICE, HIGHWAY PATROL

YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED!

 “YOU ARE INTERACTING WITH A NATURAL MAN”

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

By proceeding against this Affidavit Of Truth Notice, YOU agree to RECEIVING and READING this affidavit to testify under full commercial liability and oath of office or for the public record before a jury that you and associated parties are proceeding lawfully and that you fully understand the nature of your actions under California Codes, USC Codes, CVC Codes, UCC Codes, Common Law, CFR Codes, and International Admiralty/Maritime Law.  

This Notice Of Warning, you are hereby warned for RIGHTS violations is hereby submitted upon your demand of a “driver’s license,” “registration”, “personal identification”, “proof of insurance”, I do not agree being detained or contact with police and I have not signed, give permission or verbally entered into any contract with State, County, City government agents, entities, employees.  

Let it be known to all government law enforcement and agents, today present and future am traveling in my private automobile and not engaged in business on the roads, as you can visible see on my automobile  plates that read “PRIVATE , NOT FOR HIRE” and am not under commercial jurisdiction and DO NOT need a license.  Motor Vehicle Act of 1915 Ch. 188, Amed.1919, Ch. 147. Driving is a privilege; traveling is a Right. Our right can never be stripped from us. See U.S. Supreme Court Decisions below.

No state may convert a right into a privilege and require a license, insurance or fee for the

Exercise of that right!  MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105,

If a state does erroneously do require a license, insurance or fee for exercise of the right, the

Citizen may ignore the license and or fee and exercise the right with total impunity!

SCHUTTLESWORTH vs. BIRMINGHAM 373 U.S. 262.

You cannot be punished for the exercise of a constitutional right!

MILLER vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2nd 486.

Any governmental authority, or agent of a governmental authority, or person acting on behalf of a governmental authority having knowledge that any wrongs conspired or to be done, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing . . . Neglects or refuses so to do … shall be liable to the party injured. Any government authority deprives any person of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States or by the Constitution or laws of California, Especially where it consists of public record is deemed in law to be “Knowledge of the Facts”. The citizen has the power for immediate grounds for a lawsuit against any and all government authority personnel and their spouse pertains to conspiracy to commit fraud. Under USC Title 42 §1986  See Fee Schedule below;

I, the secure party and creditor, claim my fee schedule listed below for any transgressions by peace officers, state troopers, detectives, martial lawmen, antagonists, militia, police powers, federal government principals, agents, justice system participants.

I the NATURAL SECURED PARTY AND CREDITOR have lawful authority to use the debtor as transmitting utility in rightful and lawful activities such as operating an automobile for free travel, without permission from any and government officials including policy enforcers (peace officers, illegal government agents, sheriffs, judges, and state troopers).

FEE SCHEDULE

Body Exterior Search/Handcuffed	$100,000 ea. incident
Detained/Questioned/Interrogated	$200,000 a minute
Use My Name Over Radio/Dispatch	$500,000 ea. incident
Stun Gun/ Injured/Harmed	$500,000 ea. incident
Incarcerated/Transported	$500,000 ea. incident
Search/Seizure Interior Body/Vehicle	$500,000 ea. incident
Death By Any Means/Gun Shot Injury	$2,000,000 ea. incident

                       

IF I AM SUBJECTED TO ANY ADJUDICATION PROCESS WITHOUT MY EXPRESS WRITTEN AND NOTARIZED CONSENT, I claim the right to use a notary public to secure payment of the aforementioned fee schedule against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Notice: Using a fee schedule to lawfully collect damages does not constitute operating in commerce!

You are acting under international admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, and you are illegally operating  acting under another jurisdiction: uniform commercial statutory jurisdiction against myself, the natural and free man with immunity in both illegal jurisdictions. As I abide firmly under divine and common law jurisdiction and have lawfully preserved all my rights therein you are held at estoppal and void of all authority of any sort at this time and you cannot proceed in any way! Admiralty/maritime or alleged statutory jurisdiction do not apply to my natural and free man.

The name on any driving instrument or any commercial contract is not my name. It is the name of a government-created fictitious corporate body set in UPPER CASE LETTERS to resemble my name without my consent or conscious knowledge.

.

 I DEMAND PROOF OF CLAIM (Subject Matter/Jurisdiction) into evidence. If no evidence is produced there is no jurisdiction meaning no cause of action. You are violating my Constitution Rights and not moving under common law and bringing your statutes into harmony with such as required under uniform commercial code 1-103.6 in your damaging actions. If am not free to leave, I will start the process in filing a lawsuit against you/spouse and all officers involved, police department, city/county.

From the California Legislative, Motor Vehicle Act of 1915 Ch. 188, Amed.1919, Ch. 147. Read;

The Statute of 1913 was amended by Statute 1915 Ch. 188. This new statute retained the basic limitations on the registration requirements to only juristic persons. It was amended by statutes of 1917, ch. 218 and Statute 1919, ch. 147. These amendments were merely refinements and did not make substantive changes. From the very beginning of the code, it is clear that there is no express or even implied repeal of the exemption for the private, non-commercial use of an automobile. 

U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS

You can see the clear language that does not show in the “Revised Statutes”, (revised code is not law) my recreational travel is not regulated by written law of 1915 which no government can amend. Since 1915 it has never been changed.

Section 415(a) defines a motor vehicle as “any vehicle which is self-propelled” However this section does not apply since there is a federal definition of motor vehicle in Title 18 USC section 31 where it defines a motor vehicle as “every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo”.

Conclusion is that 4000(a) is a law that requires registration of vehicles that are used for transporting persons and property for hire, because the vehicle code is nothing more than a consolidation of laws that regulated “for profit” use of the highways.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I, officer                    received and read above affidavit of truth on this    ^th Day of           2018.               Print

                                                                        

Signed Officer                               

                                                                                                                                                                                   

DATED THE        th DAY OF                 2018

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I handed a copy of the above affidavit of truth to officer                     Badge #           the foregoing is true and correct.                                                  

Sign By                                 

       Print Name                                     

                                                                                               

This is by no means legal advice, or contract.

                                            ****** BONUS SECTION ******

                My personal Research Notes to save you time. ENJOY

U.S. FEDERAL CASE LAWS

CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODES

Motor Vehicle Act of 1915 Ch. 188, Amed.1919, Ch. 147.  Link Below Read Full Official Code; https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b5001506;view=1up;seq=1

To be that statutes which would deprive a citizen of the rights of person or property without a regular trial, according to the course and usage of common law, would not be the law of the land.  Hoke v. Henderson , 1 5, N.C. 1 5 25 AM Dec 677.

YOU CAN NOT BE PUNISHED FOR THE EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!!!  MILLER vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2nd 486.

NO STATE may convert a RIGHT into a PRIVILEGE and require a LICENSE, INSURANCE or FEE for the exercise of that RIGHT!  MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105,

If a STATE does erroneously do require a LICENSE, INSURANCE OR FEE for exercise of the RIGHT, the Citizen may IGNORE THE LICENSE AND OR FEE and exercise the RIGHT WITH TOTAL IMPUNITY!  SCHUTTLESWORTH vs. BIRMINGHAM 373 U.S. 262.

The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or Goods including private automobile is a common Right which he has under his Right to life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of happiness.  Under the Constitutional guarantee.  American Jurisprudence 1st. Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p 1135.

Per American Juris prudence 1st. Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p 1135. I do not have or required by law to have a Driver License or signed contract with California Department of Motor Vehicles. 

Civil Rights violations will be litigated in Federal Court against any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority with any state, county, city police officer at $250,000 each incident.

My RIGHTS  --- My SILENCE  not providing  ANY  personal ID/automobile documents or information that may incriminate or be used against me is my constitutional right. I require having counsel present before answering ANY questions. I  DO NOT  consent to ANY searches or seizures. I have a  RIGHT  to know if am being detained or arrested and why. If am not being detained or arrested, I am free to leave.

The Traveler is  NOT  acting in a commercial capacity as a "Driver", “Operator” of a "Motor Vehicle" in "Trade", "Traffic", or "Transportation" for hire as defined in  49 USC 31301  and therefore "motor vehicle codes" are not applicable.

Constitutional Law § 101: Automobiles, Highways: Citizen's right to travel upon public highways includes right to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business.

A random stop of a motorist in the absence of specific articulable facts which justify the stop by indicating a reasonable suspicion that a violation of the law has occurred is constitutionally impermissible and violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Constitutional Law § 101: Automobiles, Highways: Citizen's right to travel upon public highways includes right to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business.

18 U. S. C. 31. ‘‘Motor Vehicle’’ means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES ONLY on the highways in transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property and cargo.

UCC 9-109. "Automobile purchased for the purpose of transporting buyer to and from his place of employment was ``consumer goods'' as defined in UCC 9-109." Mallicoat v Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp., 3 UCC Rep Serv 1035; 415 S.W.2d 347 (Tenn. App., 1966).

A vehicle not used for commercial activity is “consumer goods”, is Not a type of vehicle required to be licensed, registered, fees or and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14.

"The Congress cannot revoke the Sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared." Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935).

When government passes an unlawful act, such as the licensing of a right, people need to know they have no obligation to obey it, for it is void from the time it was enacted. YOU CAN NOT BE PUNISHED FOR THE EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!  MILLER vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2nd 486. 

"If the common law can try the cause, and give full redress, that alone takes away the admiralty jurisdiction." Ramsey v. Allegrie, supra, p. 411.

C.V.C. 260: (a) 

A “commercial vehicle” is a motor vehicle of a type required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of property.

(b) Passenger vehicles and house cars that are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit are not commercial vehicles. (Amended by Stats. 2003, Ch. 222, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2004.) 

C.V.C. Code 14607.6. - A peace officer shall not stop a vehicle for the sole reason of determining whether the driver is properly licensed.

State / DMV agency committed fraud, deceit, coercion, willful intent to injure another, malicious acts, RICO activity and conspired by;

Unconscionable “contract” - “One which no sensible man not under delusion, or duress, or in distress would make, and such as no honest and fair man would accept.”; Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Noll, 115 Ind. App. 289, 58 N.E.2d 947, 949, 950. and;

"Party cannot be bound by contract that he has not made or authorized." Alexander v. Bosworth (1915), 26 C.A. 589, 599, 147 P.607.

And therefore;

“Failure to reveal the material facts of a license or any agreement is immediate grounds for estoppel.” Lo Bue v. Porazzo, 48 Cal.App.2d 82, 119, p.2d 346, 348.

The fraudulently “presumed” quasi-contractus that binds the Declarant with the CITY/STATE Agency, is void for fraud , since the de facto CITY/STATE cannot produce the material fact (consideration inducement) or the jurisdictional clause (who is subject to said statute). (SEE: Master / Servant [Employee] Relationship -- C.J.S.) -- “Personal, Private, Liberty”-

All Statutes, regulations, codes, ordinances by the county, city are not laws. They are Null and Void. They are laws made up by the county, city to to look like federal laws but changed words to their liking. They just piggyback off federal laws to trick you. 

 Sincerely,

 Bryant Schroder