SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM

SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM 

Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A] 

In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now called the Clearfield Doctrine. Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation. 

Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. 

Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place lawfully . . . unless you consent. Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B] In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions. 

The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils, municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign, they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws, which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts. 

 Sources: 

• Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B]
• Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A] 
• Clearfield Doctrine
• Dun and Bradstreet