U.S. CITIZENS RIGHTS ARE DISAPPEARING FAST

BY Adask's law

REPLACE ALL HIGHLIGHTED RED WITH YOUR INFORMATION.
Nov. 10 2014

There are three ‘United States’ (Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 65 S.Ct. 870, 880, 89 L. Ed. 1252 1945), ’ one being territory over which it has sovereignty. Therefore, there is the US of the Union States (US of US) and US of D.C. (US of DC). BAR attorneys pretending to be Judges always operate in the US of DC. Therefore, we have the original State of California and US of DC STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CA. This is very easy to prove – ask a court if their STATE is the original State. They will refuse to answer.

Don’t forget that their are 2 different ‘constitutions’, the original, organic Constitution For The United States of America (c.1789) , and the US Constitution (c.1871), which is the corporate charter for the United States, which was incorporated in, and exists ENTIRELY within the District of Columbia.

If “States’ Rights” (as in “States of the Union”) are gone, you are presumed to be a subject (rather than an individual sovereign), and Congress is presumed to be an aristocracy in charge of ruling this nation’s people as if we were all a bunch of animals, peons, or even slaves.

Same thing is true with the 4th, 5th, 6th Amendments that are being constantly whittled away.  Those Amendments were only intended to protect the States of the Union–not the territories.  If you debt to court and allow the courts to presume that your relevant conduct took place in a territory, you won’t have standing to make claims under the Bill of Rights. 

State agencies depending on your state,  will forward any unpaid debts to your states tax revenue depart. In CA. its the Franchise Tax Board (FTB).

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC):

“UCC 9-307 (h). Location of United States. The United States is located in the District of Columbia.”

CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE
SECTION 9301- 9342
9307. (h) The United States is located in the District of Columbia.

So, the original 13th amendment (no titles of nobility) still exists in The Constitution For The United States of America, but NOT in the ‘US Constitution’ for the District of Columbia, which has an anti-slavery 13th amendment, as well as the 14th and subsequent ‘amendments to their corporate charter that do NOT exist in the organic document from 1789, The Constitution For The United States of America.

As I always points out, it’s about VENUE, WHERE you are, as to which document applies to you, even though few seem to be aware that they have been kidnapped by the ‘United States’ and are now ‘US citizens’, and NOT ‘Americans’, by means of their SSNs: You gave up your unalienable rights.

Under Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of The Constitution of the United States,  Congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over the territories.  Within a “territory of the United States,” the Congress is the sovereign and can do anything they like.  They have unlimited powers in the territories.  The people of the territories have virtually no rights that they might be absolutely able to enforce other than those currently allowed by Congress.

But if you did your research and read the “Preamble to the Bill of Rights,” you might see that the fundamental intent behind what became the “Bill of Rights” was to protect the States of the Union–but not the territories, administrative districts or Washington DC–against intrusion by the federal government.

Thus, it’s not enough for you to scream that some legislation or court decision is “unconstitutional!”  You must also scream where it’s “unconstitutional!”  In what venue, plane or jurisdiction is the particular act “unconstitutional”?  If you won’t specify the jurisdictional context, your claim of “unconstitutionality” will be ignored because, under the Constitution, Congress has unlimited powers in the territories but only limited powers within the States of the Union.

Thus, every law Congress enacts is “constitutional” in at least some jurisdictions–the territories.  Why?  Because Congress has unlimited powers in the territories. Within the territories, Congress is the only sovereign.  Within the territories, anything goes.

Some laws that Congress enacts might be “constitutional” in both the territories and the States of the Union.  Why?  Because Congress has limited powers within the States of the Union.  If Congress enacts a law that’s “constitutional” within the jurisdictions of the States of the Union, that law is probably also constitutional within the territories.

If any government agency sends a notice for payment due, just return within 30 days of receiving debt notice, a letter with the following proof of claims. 

    Just a **WARNING**  know that the IRS/FTB have refused to answer or rebut these, because if they do answer with a gov. person signing with signature, they could be found guilty to the following laws. I have received notices with out a employee name a few times. 

       The affiant (YOU) has the power for immediate grounds for a lawsuit against any and all government authority personnel as pertains to conspiracy to commit fraud. Under USC Title 42 § 1986, and the following;

Title 18 USC as to the R.I.C.O. Act,Title 26 § 7214, 6103.18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights,18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under              color of law,49 CFR 390.3 - General applicability. (f) Exceptions

The best part is if they refuse (2 notices) to answer your request, you file a Dishonor with a state notary, to discharge all debt. 

To whom it may concern: 

Your correspondence of 06/20/2018 was received by me on June 23, 2018. Your office alleges that I owe money on debts. I am conditionally accepting your  instruments above with $0.00 balance remaining on the above-referenced file numbers. If you can provide proof of claim that: You have verified verification of the debt including all information concerning:

1. I am not a United States (14th Amendment/D.C.) citizen, person, taxpayer, contractor, resident or domicile and refuse US of DC, IRS and CA FTB any power of attorney or use of my Name, Life, Credit, or property.
2. I am not the state created fictional (YOUR NAME) ALL CAPS, A.K.A. (YOUR NAME) ALL lower case, proper name spelling, US Trust, which was created by and is owned by US of DC and is the false impersonation trust identified at 26 USC § 7701 (a) (30) (i) and (ii).
3. Is the CALIFORNIA or CA you use in sending mail that arrives at my address the 31st Union State of California?
4. Is the ‘United States’ you use in your official capacity the United States of the Union States, or is it limited to the government of D.C. (US of DC) and its alleged territories, areas, zones, states, etc.?
Hooven & Allison Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 65 S.Ct. 870, 880, 89 L. Ed. 1252 (1945), declared there are three ‘United States,’ the 2nd being territory (US of DC) over which it has sovereignty.
5. I refuse consent to US of DC, IRS, CA FTB, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, UN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CA; and, refuse them any power of government or to adjudicate any of my alleged controversies; and, require common law remedy in all instances, in a court competent to give it.
6. Does US of DC, IRS, CA FTB, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, UN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA or CA have any jurisdiction over me, the living man on the land of the 31st Union State of all Rights reserved without prejudice, sui juris, or any power to Order me to report or pay any taxes, or debts?
7. Are there any claims against me, the living man on the land of the 31st Union State of California in the instant action?
8. It is my intent to obey all laws and pay all taxes that pertain to me. Nonetheless, I have heretofore been unable to get answers to my questions from IRS and California FTB. The Supreme Court of the United States has declared it my obligation to determine the boundaries of IRS and California FTB authority before entering into any agreement with it/them.
“Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. And this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” (at page 384, italic emphasis added). The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 &.S. 380 (1947):
9. Therefore, having experienced much fraud from and by government, I require California Superior Courts, IRS, DMV,  and California FTB to take notice of validity to each of my statements, proof of claim, questions and answer or rebut any that are wrong under penalty of perjury (see 26 USC § 6065) – before any inter agency cancels, suspends, intercepts collection or garnishment from: tax refunds, levies, wages, unclaimed property claims, lottery winnings, driver license, permits, certificate, arrest warrant, or payment of any taxes.
10. This unsworn letter is made with out the United States under penalty of perjury UCC 1-308 and limited to appearance without the US of DC and under the supreme Law of the Land of the United Union States of America, and is required to all adverse parties pursuant to their 28 USC § 1746. 

ANY PARTY WISHING TO DISMISS A DISPUTE WITH RESPECT TO THE DISCHARGE MADE HEREIN MUST DO SO WITHIN (20) TWENTY DAYS, any unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. (12Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15); Claims made in your affidavit, if not rebutted; emerge as the truth of the matter. Legal Maxim: "He, who does deny, admits." Any such disputes must be wet ink signed under oath, bonded, and full commercial liability.

“Governments are corporations”, in as much as every government is an artificial, office, juristic person, an abstraction, a creature of the mind only, a government can deal only with artificial persons,  The imaginary, having no reality or substance cannot create or attain parity with the real. 

 Dated: 00/00/00                           Respectfully submitted,

                                                       ___________________
                                                       YOUR NAME
                                                        address, city, state, zip

Same thing is true with the 4th, 5th, 6th Amendments that are being constantly whittled away.  Those Amendments were only intended to protect the States of the Union–not the territories. If you allow the courts to presume that your relevant conduct took place in a territory, you won’t have standing to make claims under the Bill of Rights.

On the other hand, if you can establish that your venue, plane and jurisdiction is within a State of the Union, you may be able to give the gov-co a real run for its money.

If you want to run that race, you’ve got to learn to expressly associate the constitutionality of every law with the particular venue, plane or jurisdiction where it is effective.  You’ve got to learn to associate every law with the word “where“.